Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Struggle with Modulus questions

Expert replies
by abhishekswamy » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:33 am
Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| ≠ 0


OA. C

Can anybody explain the solution for the above question in detail. M having a tough time solving modulus questions :(
Tnks in advance :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by bblast » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:40 am
hi,
decode statement 1 by taking two possible values of LHS of the eq's.

first take -x-1 = 2x-2.
which gives x = 1/3

then take x+1 = 2x-2
whih gives x = 3

now check if both these satisfy statement 1.

they do, hence statement 1 is not sufficient,

2 negates one of the values obtained above.

hence answer is c

x =1/3
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by abhishekswamy » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:47 am
bblast wrote:hi,
decode statement 1 by taking two possible values of LHS of the eq's.

first take -x-1 = 2x-2.
which gives x = 1/3

then take x+1 = 2x-2
whih gives x = 3

now check if both these satisfy statement 1.

they do, hence statement 1 is not sufficient,

2 negates one of the values obtained above.

hence answer is c

x =1/3
Bblast: can you please explain...you have taken two case for LHS i.e when |x-1| is positive and negative,y not 2 cases for RHS also??
Join the discussion

by bblast » Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:07 am
Hi abhishek,

actually there are 4 cases :

lhs -ve rhs +ve case1
lhs -ve rhs -ve case2

lhs +ve rhs +ve case3
lhs +ve rhs -ve case4


As u can see case 2 and case 3 above are the same. similarly case 1 and case 4 are the same.
which are the actual 2 cases u need to consider.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by goalevan » Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:49 pm
-1 < x < 1?

Statement 1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1| has two cases:

x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3

x + 1 = -(2x - 2)
3x = 1
x = 1/3

We always verify that both solutions satisfy the original equation:

|3 + 1| = 2|3 - 1|
|4| = 2|2|

|1/3 + 1| = 2|1/3 - 1|
|4/3| = 2|-2/3|

With these two possible values of x, statement 1 is not sufficient:

-1 < 1/3 < 1? yes
-1 < 3 < 1? no

Statement 2) |x - 3| ≠ 0

x - 3 ≠ 0
x ≠ 3

Note that no second case exists in this equation since -0 = 0.

With different possible values of x, statement 2 is not sufficient:

-1 < 0 < 1? yes
-1 < -500,000,000 < 1? no

Combined)
x = 3 OR x = 1/3
AND x ≠ 3
x = 1/3

-1 < 1/3 < 1

Sufficient.

C
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:10 pm
we need to check if -1<x<1

a for 0.3<x<0.4 the LHS approx = RHS.
for x=3 LHS= RHS. not sufficient.

b x # 3 not sufficient.

a+b

x=0.33. sufficient.
C it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion