BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Struggle with Modulus questions

Expert replies
by abhishekswamy » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:33 am
Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| ≠ 0


OA. C

Can anybody explain the solution for the above question in detail. M having a tough time solving modulus questions :(
Tnks in advance :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by bblast » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:40 am
hi,
decode statement 1 by taking two possible values of LHS of the eq's.

first take -x-1 = 2x-2.
which gives x = 1/3

then take x+1 = 2x-2
whih gives x = 3

now check if both these satisfy statement 1.

they do, hence statement 1 is not sufficient,

2 negates one of the values obtained above.

hence answer is c

x =1/3
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by abhishekswamy » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:47 am
bblast wrote:hi,
decode statement 1 by taking two possible values of LHS of the eq's.

first take -x-1 = 2x-2.
which gives x = 1/3

then take x+1 = 2x-2
whih gives x = 3

now check if both these satisfy statement 1.

they do, hence statement 1 is not sufficient,

2 negates one of the values obtained above.

hence answer is c

x =1/3
Bblast: can you please explain...you have taken two case for LHS i.e when |x-1| is positive and negative,y not 2 cases for RHS also??
Join the discussion

by bblast » Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:07 am
Hi abhishek,

actually there are 4 cases :

lhs -ve rhs +ve case1
lhs -ve rhs -ve case2

lhs +ve rhs +ve case3
lhs +ve rhs -ve case4


As u can see case 2 and case 3 above are the same. similarly case 1 and case 4 are the same.
which are the actual 2 cases u need to consider.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion

by goalevan » Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:49 pm
-1 < x < 1?

Statement 1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1| has two cases:

x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3

x + 1 = -(2x - 2)
3x = 1
x = 1/3

We always verify that both solutions satisfy the original equation:

|3 + 1| = 2|3 - 1|
|4| = 2|2|

|1/3 + 1| = 2|1/3 - 1|
|4/3| = 2|-2/3|

With these two possible values of x, statement 1 is not sufficient:

-1 < 1/3 < 1? yes
-1 < 3 < 1? no

Statement 2) |x - 3| ≠ 0

x - 3 ≠ 0
x ≠ 3

Note that no second case exists in this equation since -0 = 0.

With different possible values of x, statement 2 is not sufficient:

-1 < 0 < 1? yes
-1 < -500,000,000 < 1? no

Combined)
x = 3 OR x = 1/3
AND x ≠ 3
x = 1/3

-1 < 1/3 < 1

Sufficient.

C
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:10 pm
we need to check if -1<x<1

a for 0.3<x<0.4 the LHS approx = RHS.
for x=3 LHS= RHS. not sufficient.

b x # 3 not sufficient.

a+b

x=0.33. sufficient.
C it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion