BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

std deveation

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by egybs » Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:44 am
you simply need to know that standard deviation is a representation of how far away from the mean the values of a set are.

So the standard deviation of 5,5,5,5,5 is smaller (it's in fact 0) than the standard deviation of 4,5,5,5,6 even though both have the same mean.

The key to this question is that we know the average, and that both sets contain at least 3 of the same numbers.. so:

Set S: [30,40,50,_,_]
Set T: [30,40,50,_,_]

For 1:
S: [25,30,40,50,_]
Give that we know the average is 40, the 5th number must be 55. So S: [25,30,40,50,55]
But we don't know anything about T, so INSUFF

For 2:
T: [_,30,40,45,50]
Give that we know the average is 40, the 5th number must be 35. So T: [30,35,40,45,50]
But we don't know anything about S, so INSUFF

Together, we can look and see that the two values that differ between S and T are a bit more spread out with S... so S will have a larger standard deviation. SUFF
Join the discussion

by dkrich » Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:52 pm
An easy way to think about it is that you know that the average of each set is 40, and three numbers from each set are given to you.

Thus you know that the sets look something like this:

S = { ......30......40.......50........}

T = { ......30......40.......50........}

At this point you know that the average is 40, so in both sets the numbers have to be balanced on both sides of 40, the real question is whether the two integers that balance one set are further away from 40 than the other For example the two numbers left out could be anything such as 10 and 70 or 39 and 41. Clearly 10 and 70 would result in the larger standard deviation.

Statement 1: Knowing that 25 is in list S allows you to conclude that set S consists of the following:

S = { 25,30,40,50,55 }

You still don't know where the two balancing integers in T sit, so this is not sufficient. If T's missing numbers are 39 and 41, the standard deviation in T is less, but if they are 20 and 60, the standard deviation in T is greater.

Statement 2: By itself is just the reverse of statement 1- you can round out T as the following:

T = { 30,35,40,45,50 }

but you don't know what balances S.

Taken together, clearly you have enough info. The standard deviation of S is greater than T.
Join the discussion