BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

A 5-year investment note offers.....

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:42 pm

A 5-year investment note offers.....

by factor26 » Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:18 pm
A 5-year investment note offers a 10% return on purchase, and a compounding 5% for each year after the first. If there is a $500 penalty for early redemption, and the note is redeemed for $6430 after the second year, what was the original purchase price?


A -$6000

B -$6048

C -$6100

D -$6150

E -$6200

ANSWER IS ACAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN?
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Thanked: 236 times
Followed by:54 members
GMAT Score:770

by GmatMathPro » Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:13 pm
Hmmmmm. What does "10% return on purchase" mean? 10% return for the first year? If so, you could set it up as follows:

Let x=purchase price

1.1x=price after one year

1.05*1.1x=price after second year

1.05*1.1x-500=price after early redemption penalty.

1.05*1.1x-500=6430

Solve for x=6000.

So that gives you the right answer. But again, I'm not sure how to interpret "10% return on purchase" when they don't specify a timeframe. Maybe someone else with more of an investment background can chime in.

What's the source on this anyway? Seems a little calculation-heavy for a GMAT problem.
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:42 pm

by factor26 » Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:37 pm
Thanks again for your help!! I found this question on the grockit website...wording seemed very weird to me as well
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:17 am
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:730

by Amiable Scholar » Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:58 pm
GmatMathPro wrote:
What's the source on this anyway? Seems a little calculation-heavy for a GMAT problem.
I agree with you. Normally you don't expect/encounter such calculation based problem in GMAT.
Amiable Scholar

Start Believing in your potential
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 12:01 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by anikendra » Sat Nov 26, 2011 12:03 pm
10% flat meams a 10% return in the 1st yr it self...question states "offers a 10% return on purchase"..compound interest starts from 2nd yr...
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:02 am
Thanked: 2 times

by kakz » Sat Nov 26, 2011 2:53 pm
@Pete
How are we assuming that the compounding of interest is based on the new principal amount of 1.1x? Is there something in problem that allows us to assume that? Hope you can clarify... I thought it would be
0.1x (Purchase return)
x (original principal)
0.055x (compounded interest accrued....based on principal balance of x and not 1.1x)

Plz clarify...Thanks
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:13 am
factor26 wrote:A 5-year investment note offers a 10% return on purchase, and a compounding 5% for each year after the first. If there is a $500 penalty for early redemption, and the note is redeemed for $6430 after the second year, what was the original purchase price?


A -$6000

B -$6048

C -$6100

D -$6150

E -$6200

ANSWER IS ACAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN?
We can plug in the answers, which represent the amount invested.
In problems involving COMPOUND interest, the initial investment is almost always a very "round" number.
Thus, the OA is likely to be A.

Answer choice A: 6000
Amount at the end of the first year = 600 + .1(600) = 6600.
Amount at the end of the second year = 6600 + .05(6600) = 6930.
Amount after the early redemption penalty = 6930-500 = 6430.
Success!

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:37 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by sk8legend408 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 8:09 am
I worked backwards which I found easier for me:

You start with 6430. The last thing the problem says is there is a $500 penalty. So you add 500:

6340 + 500 = 6930.

The second last thing stated in the problem is 5% was added. Consequently subtract by 5%.

6930 - .05(6930) = 6930 - 350(approximately) = 6580.

The first thing the problem says is to add 10% so the last step working backwards would be to subtract by 10%.

6580 - .10(6580) = 6580 - 658 = 5922

The reason we end up with 5922 is because we rounded higher in the second step thus making the final result smaller. As you can see from the answer choices 6000 is the closest answer so the answer is A.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:49 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by ollapodrida » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:24 pm
sk8legend408 wrote:I worked backwards which I found easier for me:

You start with 6430. The last thing the problem says is there is a $500 penalty. So you add 500:

6340 + 500 = 6930.

The second last thing stated in the problem is 5% was added. Consequently subtract by 5%.

6930 - .05(6930) = 6930 - 350(approximately) = 6580.

The first thing the problem says is to add 10% so the last step working backwards would be to subtract by 10%.

6580 - .10(6580) = 6580 - 658 = 5922

The reason we end up with 5922 is because we rounded higher in the second step thus making the final result smaller. As you can see from the answer choices 6000 is the closest answer so the answer is A.
I believe one of the reasons you ended up with 5922 is because there's a flaw in your approach.

Let me illustrate:

If X+0.05X=A,

We cannot go from A to X by subtracting 0.05A from A. To go from A to X, we need to subtract 0.05X. But, we don't know what X is in advance. Your answer was not too far off because X in this case was close enough to A that your method yielded a number that was close to the answer.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:49 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by ollapodrida » Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:34 pm
kakz wrote:@Pete
How are we assuming that the compounding of interest is based on the new principal amount of 1.1x? Is there something in problem that allows us to assume that? Hope you can clarify... I thought it would be
0.1x (Purchase return)
x (original principal)
0.055x (compounded interest accrued....based on principal balance of x and not 1.1x)

Plz clarify...Thanks
Compound interest will be calculated based on the principal + any interest or accrued amount in the account. You can think of the note as a bank savings account. Any money you or someone else puts into that account is eligible for the same rate of interest as the principal amount that was deposited into the account.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1