A 5-year investment note offers a 10% return on purchase, and a compounding 5% for each year after the first. If there is a $500 penalty for early redemption, and the note is redeemed for $6430 after the second year, what was the original purchase price?
A -$6000
B -$6048
C -$6100
D -$6150
E -$6200
ANSWER IS ACAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN?
A 5-year investment note offers.....
This topic has expert replies
- GmatMathPro
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
- Thanked: 236 times
- Followed by:54 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hmmmmm. What does "10% return on purchase" mean? 10% return for the first year? If so, you could set it up as follows:
Let x=purchase price
1.1x=price after one year
1.05*1.1x=price after second year
1.05*1.1x-500=price after early redemption penalty.
1.05*1.1x-500=6430
Solve for x=6000.
So that gives you the right answer. But again, I'm not sure how to interpret "10% return on purchase" when they don't specify a timeframe. Maybe someone else with more of an investment background can chime in.
What's the source on this anyway? Seems a little calculation-heavy for a GMAT problem.
Let x=purchase price
1.1x=price after one year
1.05*1.1x=price after second year
1.05*1.1x-500=price after early redemption penalty.
1.05*1.1x-500=6430
Solve for x=6000.
So that gives you the right answer. But again, I'm not sure how to interpret "10% return on purchase" when they don't specify a timeframe. Maybe someone else with more of an investment background can chime in.
What's the source on this anyway? Seems a little calculation-heavy for a GMAT problem.
- Amiable Scholar
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:17 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- GMAT Score:730
I agree with you. Normally you don't expect/encounter such calculation based problem in GMAT.GmatMathPro wrote:
What's the source on this anyway? Seems a little calculation-heavy for a GMAT problem.
Amiable Scholar
Start Believing in your potential
Start Believing in your potential
@Pete
How are we assuming that the compounding of interest is based on the new principal amount of 1.1x? Is there something in problem that allows us to assume that? Hope you can clarify... I thought it would be
0.1x (Purchase return)
x (original principal)
0.055x (compounded interest accrued....based on principal balance of x and not 1.1x)
Plz clarify...Thanks
How are we assuming that the compounding of interest is based on the new principal amount of 1.1x? Is there something in problem that allows us to assume that? Hope you can clarify... I thought it would be
0.1x (Purchase return)
x (original principal)
0.055x (compounded interest accrued....based on principal balance of x and not 1.1x)
Plz clarify...Thanks
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
We can plug in the answers, which represent the amount invested.factor26 wrote:A 5-year investment note offers a 10% return on purchase, and a compounding 5% for each year after the first. If there is a $500 penalty for early redemption, and the note is redeemed for $6430 after the second year, what was the original purchase price?
A -$6000
B -$6048
C -$6100
D -$6150
E -$6200
ANSWER IS ACAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN?
In problems involving COMPOUND interest, the initial investment is almost always a very "round" number.
Thus, the OA is likely to be A.
Answer choice A: 6000
Amount at the end of the first year = 600 + .1(600) = 6600.
Amount at the end of the second year = 6600 + .05(6600) = 6930.
Amount after the early redemption penalty = 6930-500 = 6430.
Success!
The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:37 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
I worked backwards which I found easier for me:
You start with 6430. The last thing the problem says is there is a $500 penalty. So you add 500:
6340 + 500 = 6930.
The second last thing stated in the problem is 5% was added. Consequently subtract by 5%.
6930 - .05(6930) = 6930 - 350(approximately) = 6580.
The first thing the problem says is to add 10% so the last step working backwards would be to subtract by 10%.
6580 - .10(6580) = 6580 - 658 = 5922
The reason we end up with 5922 is because we rounded higher in the second step thus making the final result smaller. As you can see from the answer choices 6000 is the closest answer so the answer is A.
You start with 6430. The last thing the problem says is there is a $500 penalty. So you add 500:
6340 + 500 = 6930.
The second last thing stated in the problem is 5% was added. Consequently subtract by 5%.
6930 - .05(6930) = 6930 - 350(approximately) = 6580.
The first thing the problem says is to add 10% so the last step working backwards would be to subtract by 10%.
6580 - .10(6580) = 6580 - 658 = 5922
The reason we end up with 5922 is because we rounded higher in the second step thus making the final result smaller. As you can see from the answer choices 6000 is the closest answer so the answer is A.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:49 pm
- Thanked: 4 times
I believe one of the reasons you ended up with 5922 is because there's a flaw in your approach.sk8legend408 wrote:I worked backwards which I found easier for me:
You start with 6430. The last thing the problem says is there is a $500 penalty. So you add 500:
6340 + 500 = 6930.
The second last thing stated in the problem is 5% was added. Consequently subtract by 5%.
6930 - .05(6930) = 6930 - 350(approximately) = 6580.
The first thing the problem says is to add 10% so the last step working backwards would be to subtract by 10%.
6580 - .10(6580) = 6580 - 658 = 5922
The reason we end up with 5922 is because we rounded higher in the second step thus making the final result smaller. As you can see from the answer choices 6000 is the closest answer so the answer is A.
Let me illustrate:
If X+0.05X=A,
We cannot go from A to X by subtracting 0.05A from A. To go from A to X, we need to subtract 0.05X. But, we don't know what X is in advance. Your answer was not too far off because X in this case was close enough to A that your method yielded a number that was close to the answer.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:49 pm
- Thanked: 4 times
Compound interest will be calculated based on the principal + any interest or accrued amount in the account. You can think of the note as a bank savings account. Any money you or someone else puts into that account is eligible for the same rate of interest as the principal amount that was deposited into the account.kakz wrote:@Pete
How are we assuming that the compounding of interest is based on the new principal amount of 1.1x? Is there something in problem that allows us to assume that? Hope you can clarify... I thought it would be
0.1x (Purchase return)
x (original principal)
0.055x (compounded interest accrued....based on principal balance of x and not 1.1x)
Plz clarify...Thanks