What is the standard deviation of Q, a set of consecutive integers?
(1) Q has 21 members.
(2) The median value of set Q is 20.
qa is a
standard deviation
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:05 pm
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
I hate to say this but - this might be the reason why 2 is insuf no laughing!simba12123 wrote:What is the standard deviation of Q, a set of consecutive integers?
(1) Q has 21 members.
(2) The median value of set Q is 20.
qa is a
2) We dont know the number of the integers in this set
may be it is JUST 20...so median is 20...but since there is no other number...SD is....I am not sure...
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
Good catch but the question stem needs to use plural language.Fab wrote:The question is mentioning that Q is a set of consecutive integers
So there is more than 1, then why OA is not D??
Thanks.
Anyways, I did not like this question.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
that's still very, very insufficient.Fab wrote:The question is mentioning that Q is a set of consecutive integers
So there is more than 1, then why OA is not D??
Thanks.
remember that standard deviation can be thought of, to first-order approximation, as the AVERAGE DISTANCE TO THE MEAN from the data points in the set.
this is not the exact definition of standard deviation, but it's more than adequate for any SD problem you'll ever actually have to face on this test.
statement (1):
remember, you don't need the actual VALUES of the numbers in a set in order to calculate the set's standard deviation; rather, all you need is knowledge of those numbers' DISTANCES FROM THE MEAN.
if you have a set of a fixed number of consecutive integers - in this case, 21 of them - then you know all those distances.
they'll have to be: 10 less than the mean; 9 less; 8 less; ...; 1 less; equal to the mean; 1 more than the mean; 2 more; 3 more; ...; 10 more.
this distribution will be unchanged regardless of the median value, so this statement is sufficient.
statement (2):
let's say the set has 3 numbers. then they are 19 (which is 1 less than the mean), 20 (= mean), 21 (which is 1 more than the mean).
let's say the set has 5 numbers. then it has the same numbers as above (19, 20, and 21), plus 18 and 22, which are both farther from the mean than ANY of the three pre-existing numbers.
this means that this 5-member set will definitely have a greater standard deviation than does the 3-member set.
so, 2 distinct values of SD for 2 different sets --> insufficient.
--
finally, let it be noted that this problem is a classic "C TRAP" (see here).
if you have the 2 statements together, then you actually know the exact numbers in the set: 11, 12, 13, ..., 31.
this is "obvious sufficiency" together, so you should be EXTREMELY wary of choosing (c) - and, of course, (e) is impossible, because the two statements together are, after all, sufficient.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron