BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

stamps

Expert replies
by daretodream » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:26 pm
Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?
(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps.
(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ajith » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:45 pm
daretodream wrote:Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?
(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps.
(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Let x be the num of $0.15 stamps that joanna bought
and let y num of $0.29 stamps that joanna bought

1) .15x + 0.29 y = 4.40 insufficient
2) x = y insufficient

Combining .44x = 4.40; x =10 sufficient
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:37 am
daretodream wrote:Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?
(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps.
(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Statement 1 tells us the total. we do not know the ratio of $0.15 to $0.29 stamps. The total figure, $4.40, ends in a 0. This would only be possible if the number of $0.29 is a multiple of 5 (or obviously 10). Quickly testing the only possible 3 cases

5 stamps x 0.29 = $1.45
$4.40 - $1.45 = $2.95 (not divisible by 15, quick way to check this is not divisible by 3. You can use the fact that 2+9+5=16 which is the quick way to check divisibility by 3).

10 stamps x 0.29 = $2.95
$4.40 - $2.90 = $1.50 (obviously this leaves 10stamps x 0.15c)

15 stamps x 0.29 = $4.45 (no need to calculate just add the above two)
Leaving 5 cents which is not divisible by 15c.

Hence there is only one possible solution and S1 is sufficient.

B is insufficient because it just tells us the ratio of A:B is 1:1. Does not tell us total or anything else

this one is tricky and a glaring example of not to use no. of eqn= no. of variable funda; as here another i.e the second eqn is implied
Join the discussion

by shashank.ism » Sun Feb 21, 2010 1:03 pm
daretodream wrote:Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?
(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps.
(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Let x be the no. of $0.15 stamps and y be the no. of $0.29 stamps

St1.) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps. ---> 0.15x+0.29y = 4.40 not suff.
St2.) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps. x=y but total stamps is not known .....so not suff.
combined: x=y , 0.15x+0.29y = 4.40 --> 0.15x+0.29x= 4.40 --> 0.44x = 4.40 --> x= 10 suff. ans C
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Join the discussion

Re: stamps

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jan 19, 2020 12:20 pm
daretodream wrote:
Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:26 pm
Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?
(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps.
(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Given: Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.
Let C = number of $0.15 stamps purchased
Let E = number of $0.29 stamps purchased

Target question: What is the value of C?

Statement 1: She bought $4.40 worth of stamps
We can write the equation 0.15C + 0.29E = 4.40
IMPORTANT: In high school we learned that, if we're given 1 equation with 2 variables, we cannot find the value of either variable.
However, if we restrict the variables to positive integers within a certain range of values, then there are times when we can find the value of a variable if we're given 1 equation with 2 variables.

To determine whether this is the case here, let's examine all possible values of E.
If E = 0, then the entire $4.40 was spent on $0.15 stamps. Since 0.15 does NOT divide evenly into 4.40, it cannot be the case that E = 0
If E = 1, then $0.29 was spent on $0.29 stamps, leaving the remaining $4.11 to be spent on $0.15 stamps. Since 0.15 does NOT divide evenly into 4.11, it cannot be the case that E = 1
If E = 2, then $0.58 was spent on $0.29 stamps, leaving the remaining $3.82 to be spent on $0.15 stamps. Since 0.15 does NOT divide evenly into 3.82, it cannot be the case that E = 2
If E = 3, then $0.87 was spent on $0.29 stamps, leaving the remaining $3.53 to be spent on $0.15 stamps. Since 0.15 does NOT divide evenly into 3.53, it cannot be the case that E = 3

IMPORTANT: At this point, we might speed up our solution by recognizing that, in order for 0.15 to divide evenly into a number, that number must end with 5 or 0.
Also recognize that, in order for the resulting value to end with a 5 or 0, E must be divisible by 5

So, from this point on, we'll just check values of E that are divisible by 5.
If E = 5, then $1.45 was spent on $0.29 stamps, leaving the remaining $2.95 to be spent on $0.15 stamps. NICE! $2.95 ends with a 5. So this MIGHT work. Unfortunately, 0.15 does NOT divide evenly into 2.95. So, it cannot be the case that E = 5

Keep going!

If E = 10, then $2.90 was spent on $0.29 stamps, leaving the remaining $1.50 to be spent on $0.15 stamps. 1.50/0.15 = 10 = C. So, one possible solution is E = 10 and C = 10
If E = 15, then $4.35 was spent on $0.29 stamps, leaving the remaining $0.05 to be spent on $0.15 stamps. Doesn't work.
If E = 20, then $5.80 was spent on $0.29 stamps. Hmmm. Looks like we can stop here!

So, there is only one possible scenario that meets the given conditions.
So, it MUST be the case that E = 10 and C = 10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.
We have no idea how much money Joanna spent on stamps.
As such, there are infinitely many scenarios that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: She bought 3 $0.29 stamps and 3 $0.15 stamps. In this case, the answer to the target question is C = 3
Case b: She bought 8 $0.29 stamps and 8 $0.15 stamps. In this case, the answer to the target question is C = 8
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion