BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sqaure of an integer

Expert replies
by sakurle » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:14 pm
If k is a positivee integer, is k the square of an integer?

1. k is divisible by 4
2. k is divisible by exactly 4 different prime numbers
Last edited by sakurle on Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

imo 2

by xcusemeplz2009 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:59 pm
i think with 2 we can know that k is not a square of an integer
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by PussInBoots » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:21 pm
1. 8 vs 16
2. k = p1 * p2 * p3 * ... * pK

p1, p2, .., pK are prime numbers in prime factorization
"exactly different prime numbers" -> p1 through pK are different (to my understanding)

hence k cannot be square of integer. Square of integers must have even numver of each prime number in its prime factorization
Join the discussion

by PussInBoots » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:21 pm
B is the answer
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:54 am
A cnt answer the question.. But in "B", i didnt understand ..

Does K should be divisible by all different prime numbers?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

Re: Sqaure of an integer

by Ian Stewart » Tue Sep 15, 2009 2:43 am
viju9162 wrote: Does K should be divisible by all different prime numbers?
There is an infinite number of primes, so it isn't possible for a number to be divisible by all primes. I think the second statement -
sakurle wrote: 2. k is divisible by exactly different prime numbers
which is meaningless as written, is supposed to read "k is divisible by exactly four different prime numbers". This statement is not sufficient; our number might be equal to 2*3*5*7, which is not the square of an integer, or it might be equal to (2^2)(3^2)(5^2)(7^2), which is the square of an integer (it's the square of 2*3*5*7).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by Onigbogi Tosin » Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:45 am
obviously, 1 Is not sufficient. Since both 8 and 16 are divisible by 4 but 8 is not a square of an integer whereas 16 is.

From statement 2 we can deduce that K/2, K/3, K/5, K/7,..., If K = 14, 2 and 7 divide K, If K = 15, 3 and 5 divide k, if k = 21 3 and 7 divide k, If k is 30, 2, 3 and 5 divide K. We can go on and on. But it's worth noting here that K = 14, 15, 21, 30 are all not square of an integer.Hence, we can say No with statement 2. Therefore, Statement 2 is sufficient (B)
Join the discussion

by sakurle » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:31 am
This is GMAT Prep question. I was also going with B. However the OA is E. Also as Ian mentioned there was a typo which I have fixed.

Thanks Ian, I understand your explanation. My reasoning was that 4 different prime numbers means 2x3x5x7 I did not think that they can appear twice.
Join the discussion