Bidisha800 wrote:500 level question and answer is (B)

Testluv wrote:received a pm.

The question asks for some claim that must be erroneous if we take a) the promotional material and b) the Harristown hotel brochure as true. Accordingly, this is a must be false question.

So we take it as true that more tourists stay in Springfield hotels than in Harristown hotels (I).

We also take it as true that Harristown's largest hotel receives more tourists than a particular hotel in Springfield--the Royal Arms (II).

Then, it must be false that the Royal Arms is the only hotel in Springfield. If Royal Arms was the only Springfield hotel then Springfield hotels would be recieving fewer tourists than Harristown's largest hotel. In that case, (I) would no longer be true.

If both of these sources are accurate

xxpatzz wrote:I think answer it's E. Here's the comment I found from other source


Statement 1 ) says that more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown

Statement 2) says that largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield

if E is true then the statement 1 would be false as more ppl stay in Harristown than in springfield(as per statement 2),

There should be more hotels other than Royal Arms so that the combined number of tourists in all the tourists in hotels of springfield will be more than harristown. Therefor "If both of these sources are accurate, however, the "Report on Tourism" for the region must be in error in stating that The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield."