Super Tricky SC

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

Super Tricky SC

by Ozlemg » Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:35 am
The policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared to the European Union's members in 2000, which imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen it for the purpose of remaining competitive with trading partners outside of the EU.

(A) The policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared to the European Union's members in 2000, which imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen it

(B) The policy of applying indirect taxes, including value added tax and excise duties, enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared with the policy applied by the European Union's members in 2000, imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened so that the country would harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosening them

(C) When it was compared with that enforced by members of the European Union in 2000, the policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania and that were less strict, were imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosening them

(D) Compared with that enforced by members of the European Union in 2000, the policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that was enforced in Lithuania was less strict, imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened so that the country would harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosened

(E) In 2000, Lithuania, compared with the members of the European Union, had a policy of applying indirect taxes, including value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced less strictly, since it imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed tightening in order that they would harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen

Source: Knewton GMAT Blog

OA D
Last edited by Ozlemg on Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:50 am
I am strugling here btw B and D and both seems wrong... what is the source

The policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared to the European Union's members in 2000, which imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen it for the purpose of remaining competitive with trading partners outside of the EU.
(B) The policy of applying indirect taxes, including value added tax and excise duties, enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared with the policy applied by the European Union's members in 2000, imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened so that the country would harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosening them
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:45 am
Hi,
'tightened' is parallel to 'loosened' in D. This parallelism is broken in all other options.
Hence, D
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:47 am
The policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared to the European Union's members in 2000, which imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen it for the purpose of remaining competitive with trading partners outside of the EU.

(A) The policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared to the European Union's members in 2000, which imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part , needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen it

(B) The policy of applying indirect taxes, including value added tax and excise duties, enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared with the policy applied by the European Union's members in 2000, imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened so that the country would harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosening
them

(C) When it was compared with that enforced by members of the European Union in 2000, the policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania and that were less strict, were imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosening them

(D) Compared with that enforced by members of the European Union in 2000, the policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that was enforced in Lithuania was less strict, imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened so that the country would harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosened

(E) In 2000, Lithuania, compared with the members of the European Union, had a policy of applying indirect taxes, including value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced less strictly, since it imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed tightening in order that they would harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen

Long SCs really check the patience.
We need to be clear with few things
1) Policies are being compared
2) The policy of applying taxes: Singular-> was
3) which imposed tax rules and tariffs ->plural-> them
4) tightened and loosening seems fine.

i feel between b and d. its b because d changes the meaning.

IMO B
what's the OA?

i hope this helps
thanks

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:25 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by Calvin123 » Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:20 am
Ozlemg wrote:The policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared to the European Union's members in 2000, which imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen it for the purpose of remaining competitive with trading partners outside of the EU.

(A) The policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared to the European Union's members in 2000, which imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen it

(B) The policy of applying indirect taxes, including value added tax and excise duties, enforced in Lithuania was less strict when compared with the policy applied by the European Union's members in 2000, imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened so that the country would harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosening them

(C) When it was compared with that enforced by members of the European Union in 2000, the policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced in Lithuania and that were less strict, were imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened in order to harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosening them


(D) Compared with that enforced by members of the European Union in 2000, the policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that was enforced in Lithuania was less strict, imposing tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed to be tightened so that the country would harmonize with the EU's requirements rather than loosened

(E) In 2000, Lithuania, compared with the members of the European Union, had a policy of applying indirect taxes, including value added tax and excise duties, that were enforced less strictly, since it imposed tax rules and tariffs that, for the most part, needed tightening in order that they would harmonize with the EU's requirements and not to loosen

Source: Knewton GMAT Blog
IMO B

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 10:38 pm

by indphoenix » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:23 pm
IMO B

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:00 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by honeysn » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:39 pm
I will go with option B.

Option B correctly compares the 'policy in Lithuania with policy of European Union"

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 8:44 am
Thanked: 1 times

by khound.siddharth » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:00 pm
D for me.

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:35 pm
OA is D.

here the is the official explanation frm Knewton :
"There's a lot underlined here, and a great strategy when there's so much going on is to focus on what's tested. We know that there is some sort of subject/verb agreement issue to watch out for and that there is a comparison at the end of the underlined portion. It seems as though many of you picked right up on the S-V agreement error and eliminated choices C and E. The pronoun errors and awkward constructions in these options should jump out of you.

So the battle is between B and D. The other thing to notice about this sentence, as stated before, is this "rather than." As SOON as you see "than," look for a correctly formed, parallel, logical comparison.

Let's check out the different things compared in B and D:

"tax rules and tarrifs that..."
B) needed to be TIGHTENED...rather than LOOSENING THEM
D) needed to be TIGHTENED...rather than LOOSENED

Choice D is wordy, but correct.Choice D makes the parallel comparison here between the two actions applied to the "tax rules and tariffs." Additionally, the pronoun "them" is totally unnecessary and creates an awkward, redundant construction. Though some pronoun use on the GMAT may be flexible, if your really stuck between two options and one contains an unnecessary pronoun, choose the other option. We KNOW that the adjective clause describes the tax rules and tariffs. The comparison is already unparallel, but using the unnecessary "them" also makes it redundant.

For example:

"The dog that I am petting and walking it belongs to my brother."

Look how awkward that "it" is!

The "when compared with" in B is much less preferable to "compared with" alone. Why use "when" if you don't need it? "When" specifically refers to time, and this sentence is not about a specific time at which the two policies were compared; in 2000, compared with another policy, the policy in Lithuania was less strict. Try to reserve "when" to describe a time period.

Students might be thrown off by the use of "that" in choice D. But remember; as long as "that" replaces the other singular item in a comparison, it's totally fine. Here, "Compared with THE POLICY enforced by...THE POLICY enforced in Lithuania..."

The comparison is parallel and logical.

You might also be stuck on the use of "like" here. "Like" can be used to compare two nouns, and it can also mean "such as." Though "like" is more casual than "such as," "like" is a preposition that can be used to introduce noun examples. When the GMAT wants to test the misuse of "like," it will use "like" to compare two things that are not nouns. Whereas a parallelism error is enough to eliminate an option, a casual, but not incorrect, use of "like" is not an error.

The answer is D. Remember to focus on what's important, including comparison terms and S-V agreement. As soon as you see a "than" or "as...as" construction, eliminate comparisons that are not parallel or logical. Watch out for unnecessary and awkward pronouns.

Remember: "that" can be used to replace a singular item in a comparison.
Use the differences between options to help, and if a construction seems awkward but you can't quite figure out why, hold onto it and use the differences between this option and other options you're left with to eliminate ERRORS."
BUT

Can someone explain to me the use of LIKE in option D? is it correct? or looking at other major issues in other options like parallelism, coparision this can eb ignored?
afterall we need the best available answer.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:43 pm
rohu27 wrote:
Can someone explain to me the use of LIKE in option D? is it correct? or looking at other major issues in other options like parallelism, coparision this can eb ignored?
afterall we need the best available answer.
Hi,
'Like' is used as a preposition. A preposition can introduce a noun/noun phrase(not clause). So, the usage of like is correct in this example.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 1:11 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:590

by viv_gmat » Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:35 pm
Guys..how much time did you take to burst this one?
It took me 3.10 mins, but got it right.

Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:07 pm
can you give few examples to elaborate this point.

Thanks
Frankenstein wrote:
rohu27 wrote:
Can someone explain to me the use of LIKE in option D? is it correct? or looking at other major issues in other options like parallelism, coparision this can eb ignored?
afterall we need the best available answer.
Hi,
'Like' is used as a preposition. A preposition can introduce a noun/noun phrase(not clause). So, the usage of like is correct in this example.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:11 pm
sameerballani wrote:can you give few examples to elaborate this point.

Thanks
Frankenstein wrote:
rohu27 wrote:
Can someone explain to me the use of LIKE in option D? is it correct? or looking at other major issues in other options like parallelism, coparision this can eb ignored?
afterall we need the best available answer.
Hi,
'Like' is used as a preposition. A preposition can introduce a noun/noun phrase(not clause). So, the usage of like is correct in this example.
Hi,
Example: Sheva, like few other BTG members, won the BTG T-shirt.
Some sports, like skiing, can be dangerous.
'like' can also be used to give example, just as 'such as' is used. But, I am not sure whether there are any OG or GMATPrep questions that use 'like' in this way.
May be experts can help on this.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Sat Jul 02, 2011 4:48 am
Frankenstein wrote: Hi,
Example: Sheva, like few other BTG members, won the BTG T-shirt.
Some sports, like skiing, can be dangerous.
'like' can also be used to give example, just as 'such as' is used. But, I am not sure whether there are any OG or GMATPrep questions that use 'like' in this way.
May be experts can help on this.
I feel first example is fine. BUT in 2nd although it is correctly comparing nouns but if we go by meaning its introducing an example and for that we strictly need to use such as.
What you feel? May be an expert can clarify this.

Thanks

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:07 am
guys can someone clear my confusion i.e if u read this part in option D

the policy of applying indirect taxes, like value added tax and excise duties, that was enforced in

than doesn't that in green refers to taxes in red???? if yes then the verb should have been were instead of was???

please correct me if I am wrong