BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Someone Kindly Explain

Expert replies
by Kaunteya » Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:13 am
If ab = 1, what is the value of (axb)(ayb)?
(1) ax = by = 2
(2) 2xy = 4

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

I understand that what the question is really asking is what is the value of xy?

(2) Clealy states what xy is equal to, so it if sufficient. What about (1). If ab=1 then ab could both be equal to 1, or a 1/2 and b 2 or a 1/3 and b 3 and so on and so forth. The value of xy changes with every combination of x and y that multiplied equals 1. For example, if a=1/3 and b=3 then for ax=2 x=6 and for by=2 y=2/3. 6x2/3 equals 4. This is the same when a=1/4 and b=4 and so on. (1) xy=4 and in (2) xy=2. They are different. How come the answer is D?

Thanks for your help.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:51 pm
If ab = 1, what is the value of (axb)(ayb)?
(1) ax = by = 2

let's rewrite the original expression as:

(ax)(ba)(yb)

based on statment (1), we know that ax=2 and yb = 2. Based on the original info, we know that ba=1.

So, (ax)(ba)(yb) = 2*1*2 = 4
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by nutreino » Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:47 am
This is from Official Guide: DS Qn 89

If @ represents one of operations +.- and x, is k@(l+m) = (k@l) + (k@m) for all numbers k, l, m?

1. k@1 is not equal to 1@k for some numbers k.
2. @ represents subtraction.

The answer says D.

--- However i see that the above expression would hold good for multiplication and not subtraction or addition.

Can someone please explain if I am missing somthing here?
Join the discussion