BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Some questions from GMAT Prep - please help

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies

DS

by aim-wsc » Tue Mar 27, 2007 12:03 pm
momentary_lapse wrote:
2) Data Sufficiency:

Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)

1) p=r
2) r=0
1) p=r is insufficient: reason +ve, -ve values...

2)r=0 insufficient: reason NO info about p

together: statement two (supports statement 1 &) tells about the exact sign of r and hence of p if related with statement 1. :)

let me explain it once again.
given equation if cross multiplied:
(r^2+2) > pr

Now p=r=0
2>0

gotcha 8)

ANSWER C
therefore
Join the discussion

by momentary_lapse » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:09 am
aim,

thanks.. how is -x = -1 * x'?

if x<0 wont -x = -1 * x = x' ?
Join the discussion

by gabriel » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:26 am
aim-wsc wrote: first off: |x| CANNOT BE equal to -x (never)

now -x|x| = (-1)* (x) * mod (x).............(remember x has -ve value already! since x<0) so let x= (-1)* x' where x'= (+ve) x

=(-1)* (-1)x' * x'
= (-1)^2 * x'^2
I think it is very easy to sq rooting above value.
which equals to =(-1)* x'
=-x

... in my own verbally challenged way this is exactly what i was tryin to explain.... may be i shuld try and avoid all those stupid jargon in the future... nywayz the explanation provided is one way at looking at the answer to the q...
Join the discussion

by aim-wsc » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:07 am
momentary_lapse wrote:aim,

thanks.. how is -x = -1 * x'?

if x<0 wont -x = -1 * x = x' ?

I took x' as +ve sign of x.

... just to explain it i used the term, its not a std notation btw.
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:28 pm
1) If x<0 , what is square root of -x|x|
And answer choices are:
-x,x,1,0 and square root of x
Given x<0:
-x is a positive number.
|x| is a positive number

Therefore, we can simplify the expression "-x|x|" as x^2. The square root of x^2 = the positive and negative values of the given variable (x). We were told initially that x<0, so the only valid root is the negative one, or -x.

This is a confusing question because, in the beginning, we interpret "-x" to be a positive number, since we know x is negative. And then, at the end, we use that same "-x" to mean the negative value of the number. Looks the same - but it isn't. Try it with real numbers

x < 0. SQRT - (-2)*|-2| = SQRT 2*2 = SQRT 4 = +/- 2 If x is negative, then only -2 is the valid root. See, with these number, how the first "-x" [-(-2)] isn't the same thing as the second "-x" [-2]?
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:32 pm
As Gabriel noted, the second problem has been transcribed incorrectly.
) Data Sufficiency:

Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)

1) p=r
2) r=0
The second statement should read "r>0." Which changes everything. :) I'll let you guys play with it now (note that this is a REALLY hard question - so don't feel badly if it's giving you fits!) - you can find the correct answer in OG11 #145.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion