BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Some part of 50 % solution....

Expert replies
by rahulg83 » Sat May 23, 2009 6:04 am
Some part of a 50% solution of acid was replaced with an equal amount of 30% solution of acid. If, as a result, 40% solution of acid was obtained, what part of the original solution was replaced?

A) 1/5
B) 1/4
C) 1/2
D) 3/4
E) 1/5
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by scoobydooby » Sat May 23, 2009 7:51 am
let there be 100 litres to start with. volume of acid: 50 ltrs.
since equal amount removed and replaced, total volume remains intact.


let x be the fraction removed and replaced.

(50-50x+30x)/100=40/100
=>50-20x=40
=>x=1/2

hence, C
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Sat May 23, 2009 9:13 am
scoobydooby wrote:let there be 100 litres to start with. volume of acid: 50 ltrs.
since equal amount removed and replaced, total volume remains intact.


let x be the fraction removed and replaced.

(50-50x+30x)/100=40/100
=>50-20x=40
=>x=1/2

hence, C
Hi Scoobydooby, can you explain how you arrived at the equation. I think I am having the usual trouble understanding what the question is asking...in this case I think I am confused with the removed and replaced concept.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Sat May 23, 2009 9:37 am
hey vemuri,

when part of a (say 100 litre) 50% solution of acid is replaced with an equal amount of 30% solution, the total volume of the solution (acid+water) remains the same, or the denominator remains the same. only the volume of acid or the numerator changes.


say x part of 100 or 100*x ltrs be removed, or 100*x*1/2=50x salt removed.
we add equal amount of 30% solution=>100*x of 30% solution
amount of acid added: 100*x*30%=30x

so 50-50x+30x/100=40/100=>x=1/2


one could plug in answer choices as well.
lets start with C:1/2

amount of acid removed: 100*1/2*1/2=25lts.
amount of acid added: 100*1/2*30/100=15 ltrs

resulting concentration: 50-25+15/100=40/100 bingo!
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Sat May 23, 2009 10:10 am
Hey scoobydooby, thanks a lot for the explanation. Here goes my thanks to you :-)
Join the discussion

by dtweah » Sat May 23, 2009 10:22 am
Vemuri wrote:
scoobydooby wrote:let there be 100 litres to start with. volume of acid: 50 ltrs.
since equal amount removed and replaced, total volume remains intact.


let x be the fraction removed and replaced.

(50-50x+30x)/100=40/100
=>50-20x=40
=>x=1/2

hence, C
Hi Scoobydooby, can you explain how you arrived at the equation. I think I am having the usual trouble understanding what the question is asking...in this case I think I am confused with the removed and replaced concept.[/quot
------------------------------------------------------------
Vemuri another way to see this is solve by intuition if the algebra is confusing. Imagine you have a container of the solution. Since the problem says Salt is 50%. Make the tolal Volume 10 and the salt valume 5. So your original salt fraction is

5/10 ( Pure Salt/ Total Volume)( don't simplify so that it feels more natural).

Now if you remove any liquid from this container, you know you will have to remove it in the appropriate ratio. If you take 1 Litre for example, YOu are not removing 1 litre of pure salt but 1 litre of salt and somthing else. You need the pure salt part for your numerator. This is 1/2 liter of salt since that is the original ratio for salt. So if you remove x liter from your 10 liter you are removing x/2 liter of pure salt. Your new fraction after removal looks like:

(5-x/2)/10-x.

The problem doesn't tell you what this fraction is. It tells you to add x back. But again when you add x back you are adding in the APPROPRIATE RATIOS. This time they give you the ratio as 3x/10 ( This is pure salt) . The other 7x/10 goes to the other constituent/s which we don't care about. Your fraction after adding x back looks like

(5-x/2+3x/10)/10-x+x. The problem gives this as 2/5 or 40%.

50-5x +3x =40

x=5. Don't panic. This is not your fraction but how much you took out.

The appropriate fraction is 5/10= 1/2.

Note as an aside that when you did your first removal you only removed 5/2 litres of salt.
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Sat May 23, 2009 10:24 am
Thanks for the nice explanation scoobydooby..
Join the discussion