BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Solving an inequality equation

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

Solving an inequality equation

by Vemuri » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:21 pm
x² - 6x + 8 > 0 Solve for x.

I understand that for the above inequality, the 2 factors are (x-4) & (x-2). So, in effect (x-4) * (x-2) > 0. I would interpret the solution to be x>2 or x>4. But, because the inequality has no = sign, x=4 will not be part of the solution & so, x>2 will not be valid. But by saying that x>4, I would be missing x=3 (which is surely a solution).

As you can see I am completely tangled trying to find the solution. Can anyone please help?
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:04 pm
Some fundamental rules of Inequality
Case I

(x-a)(x-b)>0

where a>b

so,

x>a and x<b

Case II

(x-a)(x-b) < 0

so b<x< a
provided a>b


so the question you posted is Case I


(x-4)(x-2) >0
so either x> 4 or x<2

had it been:

(x-4)(x-2)<0

Case II



2 < x < 4


Hope this Helps.Let me know you have some more questions.


Karan
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

by Vemuri » Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:33 am
Thank you Karan for sharing the rules. I want to go a step further in understanding the rules. I will appreciate if you can elaborate for a clearer understanding.

When a>b

Case I

(x-a)(x-b)>0

x>a and x<b --> How did we determine this?


Case II

(x-a)(x-b) < 0

b<x< a --> How did we determine this?
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:06 am
Thanked: 6 times

by lav » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:16 am
vemuri if you put x = 3 in x² - 6x + 8 or (x-4)(x-2)
you get

(3-4)(3-2) = (-1)(1) = -1

which is less that 0
hence x=3 is not a soln for x² - 6x + 8 >0 because -1<0 not greater
Kid in Verbal :(
Top
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 am
Case I

(x-a)(x-b)>0

x>a and x<b --> How did we determine this?


Case II

(x-a)(x-b) < 0

b<x< a --> How did we determine this?

this is something which comes from the Union and set theory, when you plot x, a and b on a number line;it will be clear
Case I

(x-a)(x-b)>0

x>a and x<b --> How did we determine this?
this means x belongs to a set of numbers: (Union of numbers which are greater that a and numbers which are less than b) - (numbers which fall between a and b)

-infinity -----------------b---------0----------a-----------------------+infinity
Case I(Bold Face part)


Similarly
Case II:

-infinity -----------------b---------0-------a--------------------+infinity

Hope this helps

karan





Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

by Vemuri » Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:29 am
lav wrote:vemuri if you put x = 3 in x² - 6x + 8 or (x-4)(x-2)
you get

(3-4)(3-2) = (-1)(1) = -1

which is less that 0
hence x=3 is not a soln for x² - 6x + 8 >0 because -1<0 not greater
Yep, you are right. I got tangled so badly I was not checking my observations. Thanks for correcting.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:1 members

by Vemuri » Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:32 am
gmat740 wrote:
Case I

(x-a)(x-b)>0

x>a and x<b --> How did we determine this?


Case II

(x-a)(x-b) < 0

b<x< a --> How did we determine this?

this is something which comes from the Union and set theory, when you plot x, a and b on a number line;it will be clear
Case I

(x-a)(x-b)>0

x>a and x<b --> How did we determine this?
this means x belongs to a set of numbers: (Union of numbers which are greater that a and numbers which are less than b) - (numbers which fall between a and b)

-infinity -----------------b---------0----------a-----------------------+infinity
Case I(Bold Face part)


Similarly
Case II:

-infinity -----------------b---------0-------a--------------------+infinity

Hope this helps

karan

Thanks for being patient Karan. Much appreciated.
Top
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:49 am
You are welcome

We are prospective B-Schools candidates and we must learn to work in group

This is just another dimension to it

Regards

Karan
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Sun May 03, 2009 8:34 pm
Please note the correction.

Check Ian's post for more details.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/inequality-p ... 12734.html

gmat740 wrote:Some fundamental rules of Inequality
Case I

(x-a)(x-b)>0

where a>b

so,

x>a OR x<b

Case II

(x-a)(x-b) < 0

so b<x< a
provided a>b


so the question you posted is Case I


(x-4)(x-2) >0

so either x> 4 or x<2

had it been:

(x-4)(x-2)<0

Case II



2 < x < 4


Hope this Helps.Let me know you have some more questions.


Karan
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1