Solve for x: 0<|x|-4x<5 = ?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:620

Solve for x: 0<|x|-4x<5 = ?

by vinni.k » Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:44 am
Solve for x: 0<|x|-4x<5 = ?

A. x<0
B. 0<x<1
C. -3/5<x<1
D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0

OA is E

I am solving this problem in the following algebraic way and not by number plugging as it is confusing me.

There are two cases
(1). 0 < -3x < 5
(2). 0 < -5x < 5

From here how should i proceed.

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Mon Jan 13, 2014 9:30 am
0<|x|-4x<5

Case 1:
0 < x-4x < 5
0 < -3x < 5
0 < -x < 5/3
==> x < 0 & x > -5/3

Case 2:
0 < -x-4x < 5
0 < -5x < 5
0 < -x < 1
==> x < 0 & x > -1

If we compare the answer choices, we see that [spoiler]{E}[/spoiler] covers maximum values.
R A H U L

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jan 13, 2014 9:46 am
vinni.k wrote:Solve for x: 0<|x|-4x<5 = ?

A. x<0
B. 0<x<1
C. -3/5<x<1
D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0

OA is E
A: x<0
Test x=-10 in 0<|x|-4x<5:
0 < |-10| -4(-10) < 5
0 < 50 < 5.
Doesn't work.
Eliminate A.

B: 0 < x < 1
Test x=1/2 in 0<|x|-4x<5:
0 < |1/2| - 4(1/2) < 5
0 < -1.5 < 5.
Doesn't work.
Eliminate B and C, each of which allows x=1/2.

D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0
Test x = -3/4 -- a value BETWEEN -1 and -3/5 -- in 0<|x|-4x<5:
0 < |-3/4| - 4(-3/4) < 5
0 < 2.25 < 5.
This works.
Eliminate D, which does not allow x=-3/4.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:620

by vinni.k » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:14 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:Solve for x: 0<|x|-4x<5 = ?
D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0
Test x = -3/4 -- a value BETWEEN -1 and -3/5 -- in 0<|x|-4x<5:
0 < |-3/4| - 4(-3/4) < 5
0 < 2.25 < 5.
This works.
Eliminate D, which does not allow x=-3/4.

The correct answer is E.
Mitch this is the exact point where i am getting confused and not solving by numbers..
Why do we go with x = -3/4 ? Why can't we just stick to D's inequality.
I took two numbers -2/5, and -1/5 and was getting 0<2<5 and 0<1<5 and same for E.

not sure how to follow.

Vinni

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:08 pm
vinni.k wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:Solve for x: 0<|x|-4x<5 = ?
D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0
Test x = -3/4 -- a value BETWEEN -1 and -3/5 -- in 0<|x|-4x<5:
0 < |-3/4| - 4(-3/4) < 5
0 < 2.25 < 5.
This works.
Eliminate D, which does not allow x=-3/4.

The correct answer is E.
Mitch this is the exact point where i am getting confused and not solving by numbers..
Why do we go with x = -3/4 ? Why can't we just stick to D's inequality.
I took two numbers -2/5, and -1/5 and was getting 0<2<5 and 0<1<5 and same for E.

not sure how to follow.

Vinni
D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0

Strategy:
Test a value that is included in one range (-1<x<0) but NOT in the other range (-3/5<x<0).
x = -3/4 is included E's range but not in D's range.
When we test x=-3/4, we discover that it satisfies 0<|x|-4x<5:
0 < |-3/4| - 4(-3/4) < 5
0 < 2.25 < 5.
Thus, the correct range must include x=-3/4.
Since the range in D does not include x=-3/4, eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:620

by vinni.k » Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:13 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote: D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0
Strategy:
Test a value that is included in one range (-1<x<0) but NOT in the other range (-3/5<x<0).
x = -3/4 is included E's range but not in D's range.
Mitch, this strategy is good, but if we don't take values from D's range -3/5<x<0, then doesn't it mean that we are not using inequality of D ? I mean to say i take one value that is included in one range (-1<x<0) but NOT in the other range (-3/5<x<0), now it gives me an impression that i am not using choice D for checking. Something out of the range will definitely not satisfy the inequality.

OR

What i have understood from your reply is that one choice needs to be eliminated (as there is only one answer in PS) . If i include a value for instance -2/5 or -1/5, it satisfies both the inequalities, but with your strategy D can be eliminated. Hence, answer is E.

I hope i am moving in a right direction.

Regards
Vinni

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:00 pm
vinni.k wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote: D. -3/5<x<0
E. -1<x<0
Strategy:
Test a value that is included in one range (-1<x<0) but NOT in the other range (-3/5<x<0).
x = -3/4 is included E's range but not in D's range.
Mitch, this strategy is good, but if we don't take values from D's range -3/5<x<0, then doesn't it mean that we are not using inequality of D ? I mean to say i take one value that is included in one range (-1<x<0) but NOT in the other range (-3/5<x<0), now it gives me an impression that i am not using choice D for checking. Something out of the range will definitely not satisfy the inequality.
The correct answer choice must include ALL POSSIBLE VALUES OF X.
In testing x=-3/5 -- a value within E's range but outside D's range -- we are in fact checking whether D includes ALL possible values of x.
Since x=-3/5 satisfies the inequality in the question stem, D's range does NOT include all possible values of x.
Eliminate D.

Another case:
If |2x - 3| < 11, which of the following expresses all possible values of x?
A: -7 < x < 4
B: -4 < x < 7

Here, we should test a value between the two upper boundaries (4 and 7) or between the two lower boundaries (-7 and -4).
Test x=5, which is included in B's range but not in A's range:
|2*5 - 3| < 11
7 < 11.
This works.
The correct answer choice must include x=5 within its range.
Eliminate A.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:07 pm
Just to expand a bit on Rahul's approach, which would be my preferred way to solve this problem:

Given an inequality like 2 < |x|, we have to consider two scenarios:

(1) x is nonnegative, in which case |x| = x
(2) x is negative, in which case |x| = -x

So 2 < |x| implies:

(1) 2 < x, if x is nonnegative
(2) 2 < -x if x is negative

Given our inequality, 0<|x|-4x<5, we have

(1) 0 < x - 4x < 5, or 0 < -3x < 5, or 0 > x > -(5/3), if x is nonnegative, and
(2) 0 < -x - 4x < 5, or 0 < -5x < 5, or 0 > 5x > -5, or 0 > x > -1, if x is negative.

Now let's examine the two inequalities together:

0 > x > -(5/3)
0 > x > -1

Since we need an inequality that works for ALL values of x, we take the more conservative bounds: the SMALLER of the two maximums (here 0 and 0, so that's easy) and the GREATER of the two minimums (here -(5/3) and -1, so we'll take -1).

That means that our inequality is 0 > x > -1, and we're set!

Once you get the hang of this, it is much quicker, cleaner, and more reliable than number picking.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:620

by vinni.k » Thu Jan 16, 2014 7:37 am
Matt and Mitch, thank you so much for your explanations. You guys are just "Great" and I really really appreciate for your responses.

I am good to go now. Thanks once again.

Regards
Vinni