BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Solution for this problem?

Expert replies
by paritosh_b » Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:49 pm
Came across this problem in one of the practice tests.

How many papers can Bill and Tim proofread in 60 minutes if they are working together?
(1) Bill can proofread twice as many papers as Tim in the same time period.
(2) Tim can proofread 30 fewer papers than Bill in 60 minutes.

A) Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.

B) Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.

C) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.

D) Either statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.

E) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question,
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by bkk_marc » Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:13 am
Hi,

I think the answer is (C) for a few reasons:

First, I look at what is given: There are two elements (Bill and Tim), a time to complete a task (60 mins), and the function (Bill and Tim working together.

I know that there are information missing to answer this questions. I either need the individual work rate or any other information that can be plug in to this equation--> RATE x TIME = WORK

In (1) Bill can proofread twice as many papers as Tim in the same time period. This just gives us how fast Bill can read or the equation (Tim=Bill x 2) I don't think there is enough information here to solve because the amount of papers Tim can proofread can be any number.

Therefore now we know its either B,C,or E

in (2)Tim can proofread 30 fewer papers than Bill in 60 minutes. This also gives us how fast Tim can proofread, and giving the equation Tim = 30 - Bill. I don't think this is enough information because we don't know the exact numbers for Bill.

Now looking at both questions together we have T= 30 - B & T = 2B

So I used the plug-in method and got this--> 2B = 30 - B and solve and then B = 10. Now we can also plug in B to solve for T ( T = 2(10) ) and T = 20.

So we both Tim and Bill working together can proofread 30 papers in 60 mins


I am not sure if this is correct, but Im just showing you step by step how I was taught to approach these type of questions. [/i]
Join the discussion

by paritosh_b » Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:43 am
Indeed,C it is :)
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:43 pm
bkk_marc wrote:Hi,

I think the answer is (C) for a few reasons:

First, I look at what is given: There are two elements (Bill and Tim), a time to complete a task (60 mins), and the function (Bill and Tim working together.

I know that there are information missing to answer this questions. I either need the individual work rate or any other information that can be plug in to this equation--> RATE x TIME = WORK

In (1) Bill can proofread twice as many papers as Tim in the same time period. This just gives us how fast Bill can read or the equation (Tim=Bill x 2) I don't think there is enough information here to solve because the amount of papers Tim can proofread can be any number.

Therefore now we know its either B,C,or E

in (2)Tim can proofread 30 fewer papers than Bill in 60 minutes. This also gives us how fast Tim can proofread, and giving the equation Tim = 30 - Bill. I don't think this is enough information because we don't know the exact numbers for Bill.

Now looking at both questions together we have T= 30 - B & T = 2B

So I used the plug-in method and got this--> 2B = 30 - B and solve and then B = 10. Now we can also plug in B to solve for T ( T = 2(10) ) and T = 20.

So we both Tim and Bill working together can proofread 30 papers in 60 mins


I am not sure if this is correct, but Im just showing you step by step how I was taught to approach these type of questions. [/i]
do you have another shorter and easier method to understand this?
Join the discussion

by bkk_marc » Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:41 pm
do you have another shorter and easier method to understand this?
Umm sure. I guess if you can create an equation for both (1) and (2) and see that there are two same variables, then you can solve for it.

But this is Data Sufficiency, so of course you go through the AD, BCE strategy. If (1) is not enough to answer the question.. then it has to be either B, C, or E.


I am not sure how else to explained this :( I am not an expert on explaining, but perhaps someone on here with credentials can explain better.

[/quote]
Dum vivimus, vivamus....
Join the discussion