BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sodium Intake--LSAT

Expert replies
by ssgmatter » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:18 am
Studies suggest that, for the vast majority of people
who have normal blood pressure, any amount of
sodium greater than that required by the body is simply
excreted and does not significantly raise blood pressure.
So only persons who have high blood pressure and
whose bodies are incapable of safely processing excess
sodium need to restrict their sodium intake.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
seriously weaken the argument?
(A) High blood pressure is more harmful than was
previously believed.
(B) High blood pressure is sometimes exacerbated
by intake of more sodium than the body
requires.
(C) Excess sodium intake over time often destroys
the body's ability to process excess sodium.
(D) Every human being has a physiological need for
at least some sodium.
(E) Any sodium not used by the body will incr

May I request Gurus to pitch in for this one...

Regards,
Philease
blood pressure unless it is excreted.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thephoenix » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:56 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Wed Mar 31, 2010 9:07 am
Please explain....

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by outreach » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:39 am
conclusion- "only persons who have high blood pressure and
whose bodies are incapable of safely processing excess
sodium need to restrict their sodium intake."
A.out of scope.we are talkig abt effects of sodium and not harmflness of BP
B.support the conclusion
C. weakens the conclusion by saying that people without BP but excess intake of sodium can fall in trouble
D. Out of scope
E. supports the conclusion
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:05 pm
Not clear....need more detailed explanation....

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by deepak4mba » Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:03 pm
IMO C.

The conclusion of the statement cautions HIGH BP people only but C presents the case in which normal BP people can also fall into the trap.

Time: 01:35

Whats OA?
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:58 pm
IMO : C
C states that its not HBP rather excess intake of sodium over time that causes indigestion of sodium and thus HBP.
This clearly states an alternate cause and undermines the argument.
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:55 pm
What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:06 pm
The answer must be C. I think E is not mentioned clearly here. I prephrase the answer. One thing is that people are eating more salt but do not have high BP. But there are people who eat less salt but have high BP (This is my assumption). I tried to find out something, which leads high salt intake in high BP in future. C does the same.
ssgmatter wrote:Studies suggest that, for the vast majority of people
who have normal blood pressure, any amount of
sodium greater than that required by the body is simply
excreted and does not significantly raise blood pressure.
So only persons who have high blood pressure and
whose bodies are incapable of safely processing excess
sodium need to restrict their sodium intake.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
seriously weaken the argument?
(A) High blood pressure is more harmful than was
previously believed.
(B) High blood pressure is sometimes exacerbated
by intake of more sodium than the body
requires.
(C) Excess sodium intake over time often destroys
the body's ability to process excess sodium.
(D) Every human being has a physiological need for
at least some sodium.
(E) Any sodium not used by the body will incr

May I request Gurus to pitch in for this one...

Regards,
Philease
blood pressure unless it is excreted.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:06 pm
The answer must be C. I think E is not mentioned clearly here. I prephrase the answer. One thing is that people are eating more salt but do not have high BP. But there are people who eat less salt but have high BP (This is my assumption). I tried to find out something, which leads high salt intake in high BP in future. C does the same.
ssgmatter wrote:Studies suggest that, for the vast majority of people
who have normal blood pressure, any amount of
sodium greater than that required by the body is simply
excreted and does not significantly raise blood pressure.
So only persons who have high blood pressure and
whose bodies are incapable of safely processing excess
sodium need to restrict their sodium intake.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
seriously weaken the argument?
(A) High blood pressure is more harmful than was
previously believed.
(B) High blood pressure is sometimes exacerbated
by intake of more sodium than the body
requires.
(C) Excess sodium intake over time often destroys
the body's ability to process excess sodium.
(D) Every human being has a physiological need for
at least some sodium.
(E) Any sodium not used by the body will incr

May I request Gurus to pitch in for this one...

Regards,
Philease
blood pressure unless it is excreted.
Join the discussion

by bichoo » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:04 am
C for sure
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:37 am
sumanr84 wrote:IMO : C
C states that its not HBP rather excess intake of sodium over time that causes indigestion of sodium and thus HBP.
This clearly states an alternate cause and undermines the argument.
@suman bhai,

I would call this kind of weakening as "causal reversal" rather than " alternate reasoning typos". Please chk out PSCR bible.
Join the discussion

by frank1 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:31 am
C as it is chained logic...

As it will create problem in body's ability to process sodium which will eventually cause the same result
"bodies are incapable of safely processing excess sodium need to restrict their sodium intake."
Join the discussion