Soaring Television Costs - SC

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:56 pm
Followed by:3 members

Soaring Television Costs - SC

by queenisabella » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:58 am
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
A) a greater proportion than it was
B) a greater proportion than
C) a greater proportion than they have been
D) which is greater than was so
E) which is greater than it has been

OA is B
I got this correct but would love your explanation.. as GMATPrep doesn't provide one :). Ultimately I think most ppl would waver between choices A and B.

Soure: GMATPrep

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun Apr 01, 2012 3:23 pm
We can eliminate D and E for using the relative pronoun "which" because it's not 1992 that is "greater than..."

C can be eliminated for using the present perfect "have been" to describe past elections.

A uses "it was." What was a greater proportion than in any previous election? Soaring TV costs. Costs are plural and "it was" is singular, so we have an agreement error.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:11 pm
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
A) a greater proportion than it was
B) a greater proportion than
C) a greater proportion than they have been
D) which is greater than was so
E) which is greater than it has been

IMO: B