BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Smoking-related illnesses

Expert replies
by erjamit » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:28 am
Hi,

I am quite confused by the following:-

Although most smoking-related illnesses are caused by inhaling the tar in tobacco smoke, it is addiction to nicotine that prevents most smokers from quitting. In an effort to decrease the incidence of smoking-related illnesses, lawmakers in Sandonia plan to reduce the average quantity of nicotine per cigarette by half over the next five years. Unfortunately, smokers who are already addicted to nicotine tend to react to such reductions by smoking correspondingly more cigarettes.

The information above most strongly supports which of the following predictions about the effects of implementing the Sandonian government’s plan?

A. The average quantity of tar inhaled by Sandonian smokers who are currently addicted to nicotine will probably not decrease during the next five years.

B. Sandonian smokers who are not already addicted to nicotine will probably also begin to smoke more cigarettes during the next five years than they had previously.

C. The annual number of Sandonian smokers developing smoking-related illnesses will probably decrease during the next five years.

D. The proportion of Sandonians attempting to quit smoking who succeed in that attempt will probably decrease during the next five years.

E. The number of Sandonians who quit smoking during the next five years will probably exceed the number who quit during the last five years.

OA A

Also, it will be very helpful if someone can discuss the strategy to tackle similar questions.

Thanks
Amit
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by NSNguyen » Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:20 pm
A, directly express the situation
B, Irr
C, contradict, weakend the prediction
D, Irre
E, irr, comparison not makes effect.

the issue is the prediction that the number of smoked illness cause by tar will not decrease.

A reveal this.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by reachac » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:44 pm
IMO A.

Tar quant would increase means it wouldnt decrease :lol:
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:32 am
This is a must be true type ?
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:40 am
mmslf75 wrote:This is a must be true type ?
Yes sir it is. But notice that all of the answer choices use the word "probably". So we'd be asking ourselves whether it must be true that something is probably true....which of course is the same thing as simply asking whether something is probably true.

The only reason this is happening here is because the answer choices use the word "probably". This is still a must be true question.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by jainrahul1985 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:23 am
Why is option B wrong and A correct ?
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:38 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:Why is option B wrong and A correct ?
WHy would not people who are not addicted to smoking would start smoking more ciggis..
Also...check the bold part...

smokers who are already addicted to nicotine tend to react to such reductions by smoking correspondingly more cigarettes.
Join the discussion

by jainrahul1985 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:45 am
I am still not convinced with the explanation . Can experts comment on this ?
Join the discussion

by ov25 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:04 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:I am still not convinced with the explanation . Can experts comment on this ?
I am no expert. However, I want to offer my views if they help
B. Sandonian smokers who are not already addicted to nicotine will probably also begin to smoke more cigarettes during the next five years than they had previously.
Note choice B deals with 1) those "who are not already addicted". Whereas the stimulus is about people who are addicted to nicotine in the sense that it prevent them from quitting. As the answer has to be suggested or inferred...this is wrong choice
2) Compares with numbers from previous years with those of next five years...the passage offers no statistics around previous years..this is true of E as well.

However, A is fairly supported. One of the premises is that nicotine prevents from quitting. This means that in order to maintain the levels of nicotine in blood, smokers may have to smoke more cigarettes (against quitting).

All other choices are wrong as in case C, (Cause-effect) tar -> annual sri ^ (smoking rel. illnesses increase). This is a classic mistaken negation tar\ (\=neg) -> sri\..... as there may be other causes besides tar that result in sri. (flawed). D talks about proportion of "suceeded quitters" among attempted quitters. Needless to say this proportion is outside the passage. We talked about E already.

hth
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Sun Sep 19, 2010 8:52 pm
Testluv wrote:
mmslf75 wrote:This is a must be true type ?
Yes sir it is. But notice that all of the answer choices use the word "probably". So we'd be asking ourselves whether it must be true that something is probably true....which of course is the same thing as simply asking whether something is probably true.

The only reason this is happening here is because the answer choices use the word "probably". This is still a must be true question.
Excellent reasoning. By this we can conclude that 'A' is the correct answer.
Join the discussion

by tracyyahoo » Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:28 am
a has a probably, why is it wrong in here???


paddle_sweep wrote:
Testluv wrote:
mmslf75 wrote:This is a must be true type ?
Yes sir it is. But notice that all of the answer choices use the word "probably". So we'd be asking ourselves whether it must be true that something is probably true....which of course is the same thing as simply asking whether something is probably true.

The only reason this is happening here is because the answer choices use the word "probably". This is still a must be true question.
Excellent reasoning. By this we can conclude that 'A' is the correct answer.
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:55 am
(A)...Tar is not decreasing
Join the discussion