Smoking-related illnesses

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:36 am
Thanked: 7 times

Smoking-related illnesses

by erjamit » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:28 am
Hi,

I am quite confused by the following:-

Although most smoking-related illnesses are caused by inhaling the tar in tobacco smoke, it is addiction to nicotine that prevents most smokers from quitting. In an effort to decrease the incidence of smoking-related illnesses, lawmakers in Sandonia plan to reduce the average quantity of nicotine per cigarette by half over the next five years. Unfortunately, smokers who are already addicted to nicotine tend to react to such reductions by smoking correspondingly more cigarettes.

The information above most strongly supports which of the following predictions about the effects of implementing the Sandonian government’s plan?

A. The average quantity of tar inhaled by Sandonian smokers who are currently addicted to nicotine will probably not decrease during the next five years.

B. Sandonian smokers who are not already addicted to nicotine will probably also begin to smoke more cigarettes during the next five years than they had previously.

C. The annual number of Sandonian smokers developing smoking-related illnesses will probably decrease during the next five years.

D. The proportion of Sandonians attempting to quit smoking who succeed in that attempt will probably decrease during the next five years.

E. The number of Sandonians who quit smoking during the next five years will probably exceed the number who quit during the last five years.

OA A

Also, it will be very helpful if someone can discuss the strategy to tackle similar questions.

Thanks
Amit
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:20 pm
A, directly express the situation
B, Irr
C, contradict, weakend the prediction
D, Irre
E, irr, comparison not makes effect.

the issue is the prediction that the number of smoked illness cause by tar will not decrease.

A reveal this.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org

Legendary Member
Posts: 572
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:25 am
Thanked: 21 times

by reachac » Fri Jul 18, 2008 11:44 pm
IMO A.

Tar quant would increase means it wouldnt decrease :lol:

Legendary Member
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members

by mmslf75 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:32 am
This is a must be true type ?

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:40 am
mmslf75 wrote:This is a must be true type ?
Yes sir it is. But notice that all of the answer choices use the word "probably". So we'd be asking ourselves whether it must be true that something is probably true....which of course is the same thing as simply asking whether something is probably true.

The only reason this is happening here is because the answer choices use the word "probably". This is still a must be true question.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:08 am
Thanked: 4 times

by jainrahul1985 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:23 am
Why is option B wrong and A correct ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members

by adi_800 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:38 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:Why is option B wrong and A correct ?
WHy would not people who are not addicted to smoking would start smoking more ciggis..
Also...check the bold part...

smokers who are already addicted to nicotine tend to react to such reductions by smoking correspondingly more cigarettes.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:08 am
Thanked: 4 times

by jainrahul1985 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:45 am
I am still not convinced with the explanation . Can experts comment on this ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:23 pm
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members

by ov25 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:04 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:I am still not convinced with the explanation . Can experts comment on this ?
I am no expert. However, I want to offer my views if they help
B. Sandonian smokers who are not already addicted to nicotine will probably also begin to smoke more cigarettes during the next five years than they had previously.
Note choice B deals with 1) those "who are not already addicted". Whereas the stimulus is about people who are addicted to nicotine in the sense that it prevent them from quitting. As the answer has to be suggested or inferred...this is wrong choice
2) Compares with numbers from previous years with those of next five years...the passage offers no statistics around previous years..this is true of E as well.

However, A is fairly supported. One of the premises is that nicotine prevents from quitting. This means that in order to maintain the levels of nicotine in blood, smokers may have to smoke more cigarettes (against quitting).

All other choices are wrong as in case C, (Cause-effect) tar -> annual sri ^ (smoking rel. illnesses increase). This is a classic mistaken negation tar\ (\=neg) -> sri\..... as there may be other causes besides tar that result in sri. (flawed). D talks about proportion of "suceeded quitters" among attempted quitters. Needless to say this proportion is outside the passage. We talked about E already.

hth

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Sun Sep 19, 2010 8:52 pm
Testluv wrote:
mmslf75 wrote:This is a must be true type ?
Yes sir it is. But notice that all of the answer choices use the word "probably". So we'd be asking ourselves whether it must be true that something is probably true....which of course is the same thing as simply asking whether something is probably true.

The only reason this is happening here is because the answer choices use the word "probably". This is still a must be true question.
Excellent reasoning. By this we can conclude that 'A' is the correct answer.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:03 am
Thanked: 3 times

by tracyyahoo » Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:28 am
a has a probably, why is it wrong in here???


paddle_sweep wrote:
Testluv wrote:
mmslf75 wrote:This is a must be true type ?
Yes sir it is. But notice that all of the answer choices use the word "probably". So we'd be asking ourselves whether it must be true that something is probably true....which of course is the same thing as simply asking whether something is probably true.

The only reason this is happening here is because the answer choices use the word "probably". This is still a must be true question.
Excellent reasoning. By this we can conclude that 'A' is the correct answer.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:47 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by ArunangsuSahu » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:55 am
(A)...Tar is not decreasing