BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Slope

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by grockit_jake » Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:43 pm
Given that they intersect at a point (5,1) in this case, the other point is important in determining the slope.

If one line always hits the y-axis higher than the other, then that means

1. their slopes are different
2. If the slopes are positive, the slope of the line hitting highest on the y-axis (but below 1) is smaller than the slope of the other line
3. I the slope are negative, the slope of the line hitting lowest on the y-axis (but above 1) will be "larger" than the slope of the other line.

While the absolute values of the slopes switch, the line hitting higher on the y-axis will always have a lower slope, whether +/- or 0.
Jake Becker
Academic Director
Grockit Test Prep
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by mridul_dave » Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:19 am
grockit_jake wrote:Given that they intersect at a point (5,1) in this case, the other point is important in determining the slope.

If one line always hits the y-axis higher than the other, then that means

1. their slopes are different
2. If the slopes are positive, the slope of the line hitting highest on the y-axis (but below 1) is smaller than the slope of the other line
3. I the slope are negative, the slope of the line hitting lowest on the y-axis (but above 1) will be "larger" than the slope of the other line.

While the absolute values of the slopes switch, the line hitting higher on the y-axis will always have a lower slope, whether +/- or 0.
Do we have to respond based on absolute values ?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:58 am
mridul_dave wrote:
grockit_jake wrote:Given that they intersect at a point (5,1) in this case, the other point is important in determining the slope.

If one line always hits the y-axis higher than the other, then that means

1. their slopes are different
2. If the slopes are positive, the slope of the line hitting highest on the y-axis (but below 1) is smaller than the slope of the other line
3. I the slope are negative, the slope of the line hitting lowest on the y-axis (but above 1) will be "larger" than the slope of the other line.

While the absolute values of the slopes switch, the line hitting higher on the y-axis will always have a lower slope, whether +/- or 0.
Do we have to respond based on absolute values ?
You have some other options such as sketching and applying the slope formula.
Statement (1): lines pass through (5,1). We can sketch this to show that statement (1) is INSUFFICIENT
Image

Statement (2): the y-intercept of line n is greater than y intercept of line p.
We can use sketches to show that statement (2) is INSUFFIENT.
Image

Statements 1 and 2: Let n be the y-intercept of line n, and let p be the y-intercept of line p.
So, the two points of intersection with the y-axis are (0,n) and (0,p). We also know that n>p (from statement 2)

When we apply the slope formula, we get:
Slope of line n = (1-n)/(5-0)= (1-n)/5
Slope of line p = (1-p)/(5-0)= (1-p)/5
Since n>p, we know that (1-p)/5 (the slope of p) will be greater than (1-n)/5 (the slope of n)

So, statements 1&2 combined are SUFFICIENT
Answer = C
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by palvarez » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:13 pm
okigbo wrote:Lines n and p lie in xy plane. Is slope of line n less than slope of line p?
a. Lines n and p intersect at (5, 1)
b. Y-intercept of line n is greater than y intercept of line p

Let n and p be slopes of n and p.

N: y = nx+a
P: y = px+b

1 = 5n +a = 5p +b
5(p-n) = a - b > 0

p - n > 0

C is the answer
Join the discussion