BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

slope of line M

Expert replies
by gmatdriller » Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:57 am
If lines L and M are parallel on the x-y plane, what is the slope of line M?

(i) Line L passes through point (1, 1)
(ii) Line M passes through point (3, 2)

Do we need to calculate a specific value here?

OA is E
Last edited by gmatdriller on Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by eagleeye » Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:13 am
gmatdriller wrote:If lines L and M are parallel on the x-y plane, what is the slope of line M?

(i) Line L passes through point (1, 1)
(ii) Line M passes through point (3, 2)

Do we need to calculate a specific value here?

OA is C
OA is wrong here. My first instinct was to visualize and see two parallel equidistant lines passing through two points and I saw infinite lines. So I figured the answer is E. But after reading the answer supplied, I did it algebraically. I still got the answer as E. Please correct the OA.

Here's the explanation.

Since the two lines are parallel, they have the same slope. Let's call it m. So the general equation of the line is y=mx+c. With that in mind, let`s look at the statements:

(i) Line L passes through point (1, 1)
Let L be the y intercept of line L. Here y=mx+L
Since it passes through 1,1 =. 1=m+L.
Two unknowns in a single equation, Insufficient.


(ii) Line M passes through point (3, 2)
In the same way as above, let the equation be y=mx+M, then 2=3m+M.
Again, Two unknowns in a single equation, Insufficient.

Together we have:
1=m+L
2=3+M.

Two equations and three unknowns, still doesn`t have a unique solution. Insufficient.

So, the correct answer is E.

Let me know if this helps :)
Join the discussion

by mdavidm_531 » Wed Jul 04, 2012 7:12 am
OA is E.

Try drawing.

Two points: one at 1,1 and another one at 3,2

You can draw infinite possibilities of line l and m that are parallel - any angle.

This alone makes the data insufficient. :)
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:16 pm
OA is hereby corrected.
Join the discussion