BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

simple question

Expert replies
by kanha81 » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:15 pm
q: how many multiples of 3 between 10 and 90 inclusive?

Is this a fluke? OR Is this a wrong way of finding the multiples?

90-10 + 1=81

81/3 = 27 multiples

Thanks.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Feep » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:25 pm
The answer is correct in this particular case, because the set of numbers has a cardinality of 81. Since 81 is an even multiple of three, the particular starting points and end points are irrelevant; the range will always contain 27 multiples of three.

However, if the set contains a number of elements that is NOT a multiple of three, the answer may be plus or minus one depending on the starting and ending points. So you have to be careful.

Honestly, with a question like this, it should take under a minute to literally count out every single multiple of three in that range and just count them up. If you're unsure, just dive into the inelegant solution and come up a minute richer. = D
I tutor GMAT/GRE level mathematics privately in the Los Angeles region, as well as via Skype for a discounted rate. Send me a message if you're interested.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:00 pm
Certainly nothing wrong with counting them all if you don't know a quicker way - better that than doing nothing! Still, you might run into a set with a few hundred elements, and then counting wouldn't be an option.

Let's look at a problem where it would be impractical to count one by one: how many multiples of 3 are there between 100 and 1000?

There are a few ways to do this. You could, for example, do as follows:

-Figure out where your set starts and ends. It's easy to recognize multiples of 3 (the sum of the digits is divisible by 3), so we want to know how many numbers are in this list:

102, 105, 108, 111, ..., 990, 993, 996, 999

-Any set of consecutive multiples is what I'll call 'evenly spaced' - here, we go up by 3 each time to find the next number in the list. We can always count how many elements are in an evenly spaced list:
  • Figure out how far you go from the start of the list to the end, so find: largest - smallest;
  • Now, we're only looking at every third number, so we want to divide by 3 (the 'space' between each number in the list)
  • Finally, we need to add 1 at the end, or else we're leaving out the smallest number.
That is, in any 'evenly spaced' list, you can find the number of elements by calculating:

[(largest - smallest)/'space' ] + 1

Here we get:

[(999 - 102)/3] + 1 = 299 + 1 = 300

'Evenly spaced' sets are very common in mathematics - consecutive integers, consecutive even or odd integers, consecutive multiples of any number, and any list of consecutive numbers that give a fixed remainder when dividing by something are all evenly spaced lists. So it can be useful to know about them. Not only can you count the number of elements in an evenly spaced list using the above, but it's also very useful to know that in an evenly spaced set, the average, the median, and the average of the largest and smallest elements are always equal to each other.

There are often simpler approaches to these kinds of problems - the formula above is never actually necessary. Here, we could have factored out a 3 from each number in the list:

102, 105, 108, 111, ..., 990, 993, 996, 999
= 3*34, 3*35, 3*36, 3*37, ..., 3*330, 3*331, 3*332, 3*333

from which we can see that the list 34, 35, 36, 37, ..., 330, 331, 332, 333 is the same length as the list 102, 105, ..., 996, 999. Now subtracting 33 from each number, we'll get a set of the same size:

1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 297, 298, 299, 300

which clearly has 300 elements.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by mkbigmoz » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:59 pm
Just a quick question regarding your formula Ian. Do you always have to add 1 to the end of the formula? Feep explained that you might have to subtract 1 at the end of the formula. Can you provide an example of this?


Thanks
Join the discussion

by Feep » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:01 am
Ian's formula is correct regardless of circumstance, because the formula takes into account the specific starting and stopping points of the series. I said to be careful because the start and stop could effect your result if you merely count up the number of elements (10 to 90) and divide by 3.
I tutor GMAT/GRE level mathematics privately in the Los Angeles region, as well as via Skype for a discounted rate. Send me a message if you're interested.
Join the discussion