BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Range of numbers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by iamjakekim » Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:13 pm
B?

Range/2 > SD.

Since SD is 500, Range must be greater than 500.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:16 pm
iamjakekim wrote:B?

Range/2 > SD.

Since SD is 500, Range must be greater than 500.
Can you please tell more abt this rule i.e. how the relation between SD and range exist ? I am not able to find relation between range and standard deviation.

As per my understanding SD is calculated as below:

1. Let's say there are N numbers.
2. Take the mean of numbers.
3. Subtract every number from the mean.
4. Square every number that we received in step 3.
5. Add all the numbers that we get in step 4.
6. Take the average of the number that we get in step 5.
7. Take the positive square root of the number that we get in step 6.
8. standard deviation is the number that we get in step 7 above.

For e.g. let say's numbers are 1, 2, 3. Thus the above steps become:

1. N = 3.
2. Mean = 2.
3. subtracting we get (1, 0, -1)
4. squaring we get (1, 0, 1)
5. Adding = 1 + 0 + 1 = 2.
6. Average = 2/3
7. square root = (2/3)^(1/2)
8. Standard deviation = (2/3)^(1/2)

But in the above calculation looks like there is no relation between range and standard deviation.

Please tell what I am missing here.
Join the discussion

by iamjakekim » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:10 pm
I am pretty sure there is a relation ship between R and SD.

However, I am not an expert. I just memorized that R/2 > SD.

Median and Mean has no relationship. <--- This one as well.

You jsut memorize it.
Join the discussion

by iwill » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:13 pm
Hi,

I couldnt figure out a connection between the two..
pls explain.

Thanks,
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:30 pm
SD is always less than the range
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:58 pm
mehravikas wrote:SD is always less than the range
Can you please tell why ?
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:32 am
iamjakekim wrote:I am pretty sure there is a relation ship between R and SD.

However, I am not an expert. I just memorized that R/2 > SD.

Median and Mean has no relationship. <--- This one as well.

You jsut memorize it.
Hi iamjakekim,

IMO there is a relation between mean and median....for a AP set....

when the difference between numbers is fixed, then in that mean = median. But the converse is not true...i.e. if mean = median for a given set then it does not mean that numbers are in AP.

I am not aware of any other relation between mean and median except the above one.

Thanks
Mohit
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:06 pm
I have to search for a GMAT Prep question for this...its on this forum !!
goelmohit2002 wrote:
mehravikas wrote:SD is always less than the range
Can you please tell why ?
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:00 pm
mehravikas wrote:I have to search for a GMAT Prep question for this...its on this forum !!
goelmohit2002 wrote:
mehravikas wrote:SD is always less than the range
Can you please tell why ?
Can you please help.....because I am not aware of any relation that exist between Range and standard deviation....except that when Range = 0, then standard deviation = 0.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Sat Aug 22, 2009 2:01 am
my pick is standard deviation is less than the range but how much less cannot determine unless we have the complete set of numbers.

Unfortunately, I am not able to find that post. But I do remember it because as soon as I read it I added it to my notes.

We can ask some great minds on this forum. I hope you are aware of other rules of standard deviation such as.

1. If you add, subtract the set of numbers by a constant then the SD doesn't change
2. If you multiply SD will change
goelmohit2002 wrote:
mehravikas wrote:I have to search for a GMAT Prep question for this...its on this forum !!
goelmohit2002 wrote:
mehravikas wrote:SD is always less than the range
Can you please tell why ?
Can you please help.....because I am not aware of any relation that exist between Range and standard deviation....except that when Range = 0, then standard deviation = 0.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:25 am
mehravikas wrote:my pick is standard deviation is less than the range but how much less cannot determine unless we have the complete set of numbers.

Unfortunately, I am not able to find that post. But I do remember it because as soon as I read it I added it to my notes.

We can ask some great minds on this forum. I hope you are aware of other rules of standard deviation such as.

1. If you add, subtract the set of numbers by a constant then the SD doesn't change
2. If you multiply SD will change
Yes, I am aware of the other rules...thanks for refreshing the same in my memory....

but can you please tell why SD should be less than range ? Any mathematical reason ?
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:36 am
Just searched on the net too...I am not able to find any such relationship....

https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php

For e.g. The above link details how to calculate the SD etc...but does not tell any link between them
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:47 am
I'm sure that I saw it on this forum...
goelmohit2002 wrote:Just searched on the net too...I am not able to find any such relationship....

https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php

For e.g. The above link details how to calculate the SD etc...but does not tell any link between them
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:03 pm
The formula for range is R = xn - x1 (greatest value of set - smallest value of set).

The formula for standard deviation is... pretty long and hard to explain. All you should remember here is that the standard deviation is the average distance from the mean of the set to the set's components.

So you know the following:
- R = distance from greatest to smallest (basically longest distance in set)
- SD = average distance from mean (which is somewhere in the middle) to an element of the set

As you can probably guess from the above, R will always be greater than SD. I'm not sure if indeed R/2 > SD and I'm not even going to go as far as to pretend I want to try to demonstrate it, seen as how the formula for SD is impossibly long and convoluted (general case of n elements in set).

However, if you remember that R > SD, it will be more than enough to solve the problem at hand.

Edit: After some philosophical 3 a.m. thinking, the R/2 > SD formula may not be that hard to demonstrate. Will try maybe tomorrow.
Join the discussion