-
OnlyNeeds600
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:36 pm
I have around a month left and need some understanding my score information so that I know what to focus on. On the Manhattan test I recently took I got a 36 in quant and a 34 in verbal. The problem is that I feel like the verbal score isn't accuratly showing my skill level. It had 27 700-800 difficulty level questions! I got 20 questions wrong in total- 17 700-800 lvl, 1 500-600 lvl, and 2 600-700 lvl. However, since I was revieving so many high level questions and got many of them right shouldnt my verbal score be higher than a 34?
In quant, I got a bunch of questions wrong on a bunch of different levels and only recieved 4 700-800 level questions and got them all wrong.
According to what I know about adaptive tests should'nt I have gotton a higher score on Verbal than Quant since I was getting more higher level questions and getting many of them correct on Verbal instead of the 36 Quant and 34 Verbal score that I recieved?
I feel like I should spend the rest of my time studying quant, however this practice test threw me for a loop and now I'm wondering if I should split my time evenly between studying for the two sections. Please let me know. Thanks.
In quant, I got a bunch of questions wrong on a bunch of different levels and only recieved 4 700-800 level questions and got them all wrong.
According to what I know about adaptive tests should'nt I have gotton a higher score on Verbal than Quant since I was getting more higher level questions and getting many of them correct on Verbal instead of the 36 Quant and 34 Verbal score that I recieved?
I feel like I should spend the rest of my time studying quant, however this practice test threw me for a loop and now I'm wondering if I should split my time evenly between studying for the two sections. Please let me know. Thanks.












