BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Short cut for this question ? anu suggestions

Expert replies
by cmal_s » Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:57 am
Data Sufficiey

Martha can buy 2 pencils either 23cents or 21 cents. How many 23 cents pencils did she buy

1) She bought a to total 6 pencils

2) she spent a total of 130cents on the purchase


i know you can go on subtracting but is there a faster method
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by analyst218 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:50 am
cmal_s wrote:Data Sufficiey

Martha can buy 2 pencils either 23cents or 21 cents. How many 23 cents pencils did she buy

1) She bought a to total 6 pencils

2) she spent a total of 130cents on the purchase


i know you can go on subtracting but is there a faster method
is the OA D?
if it is,
i would just set up equation
x+y=6
23x+21y=130
2equations 2 unknowns -> D.

OA ? is it b..
Join the discussion

by newton9 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:53 am
For statement 2,

x 23 + y. 21 = 130.

X = 1 means 21.y should end with 7 only possibility is 7 => this doesnot satisfy equation.

X = 2 meands 21.y should end with 4 ==> this satisfies

X = 3 means 21.y should end with 1 ==> Doesnot satisfy.

This is a way that I can think of without substracting.
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:31 pm
cmal_s wrote:Data Sufficiey

Martha can buy 2 pencils either 23cents or 21 cents. How many 23 cents pencils did she buy

1) She bought a to total 6 pencils

2) she spent a total of 130cents on the purchase


i know you can go on subtracting but is there a faster method
this is a tricky one I think....

statement 1 is clearly not sufficient.

However, if you consider statement 2 and try to setup an equation, no doubt you'll have two variables.

23 X + 21 Y = 130 .

Notice that 130 is not a multiple of either 23 or 21. hence, she purchased some of each type.

Now, there will be only one set of values of X & Y which will satisfy this equation and that will be (2,4).

Hence, IMO B should be the correct choice.

What's the OA and OE ?
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by analyst218 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:36 pm
harshavardhanc wrote:
cmal_s wrote:Data Sufficiey

Martha can buy 2 pencils either 23cents or 21 cents. How many 23 cents pencils did she buy

1) She bought a to total 6 pencils

2) she spent a total of 130cents on the purchase


i know you can go on subtracting but is there a faster method
this is a tricky one I think....

statement 1 is clearly not sufficient.

However, if you consider statement 2 and try to setup an equation, no doubt you'll have two variables.

23 X + 21 Y = 130 .

Notice that 130 is not a multiple of either 23 or 21. hence, she purchased some of each type.

Now, there will be only one set of values of X & Y which will satisfy this equation and that will be (2,4).

Hence, IMO B should be the correct choice.

What's the OA and OE ?
Yea actually I think it is B too.
Join the discussion

by cmal_s » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:07 pm
Yes the Answer is B
Join the discussion

by gmatguy81 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:09 pm
IMO its B

I would go this way:


u know 1.30 is not divisible by 23 or 21 totally so it has to be a combination of the two


now u want to take the unit digits which are 3 and 1 (from 23 and 21) and make it 0 (to 130)

since we know it is not all 23 cents pencils.... start with one 23 cents pencil and chose the other number for the difference:


so it cld be 1 *3 + 5*1 = 8 --- X
next

2*3 +4*1 = 0 -- Correct answer !
Join the discussion

by lkm » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:18 pm
IMO (B).

Here is my approach.

Condition (1) is clearly insufficient.

For condition (2), we can really solve this making equations, however, another approach is to multiply 21 or 23 by certain number to achieve nearby 130.

Taking 21 at first,

21 X 6 = 126 (BTW, I steal number 6 as multiplier from the condition 1) :D

So, here we lack cents by 4. To add these 4 cents we need 23 cents' pencils.
For each 2 cents, we need to add one pencil costing 23 cents (23 - 21 = 2).

So, 2 pencils of 23 cents are required.

Looks like we have solve the question, but wait is there any other answers could be?

If you have time and want to be sure, check for any other splits otherwise go ahead and choose (B).

I am sure, you won't get any. ;)
The RULE Breaker
----------------------
I am born to fly, not to live in boundaries
Join the discussion

by analyst218 » Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:21 am
cmal_s wrote:Yes the Answer is B
I guess you can just reason it out
if you can prove by statement 2 alone that the total cannot be more than 6.

if you have 7 of 21cents pencils, 147 is more than 130.
therefore the total must be less or equal to 6.
then you can find X and Y by statement 2 alone.
Join the discussion