BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Short cut for this GMATPREP QUESTION

Expert replies
by john1234 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:49 am
During a 40 mile trip, Marla traveled at a average spped of x miles per hour for the first y miles of the trip and at an average speed of 1.25x miles per hour for the last 40-y miles of the trip.The time that Marla took to travel the 40 miles was what percent of the time it would have taken her if she had traveled at an average speed of x mile per hour for the entire trip?

1) x = 48
2) y = 20

It took me 3 minutes to solve this question.I need any help i can get on this.Ian and Stuart pls help.
Even impossible says I M possible
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by amitansu » Fri Aug 01, 2008 3:35 am
It takes a little while to formulate the equation, and then it becomes easier i guess..

According to question :

t1=y/x and t2=40-y/1.25x

total time=(t1+t2)=y/x+(40-y)/1.25x

and q asks the value of [y/x+(40-y)/1.25x]/40/x * 100
by solving we can get .25y+40/1.25 * 100 and this value is what is asked for.

Is the ans B here ?

Amit
Join the discussion

by john1234 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:40 pm
Yeah.OA is B. i solved it the way you did.But it took me some time to figure it out.
Thanx.
Even impossible says I M possible
Join the discussion

Re: Short cut for this GMATPREP QUESTION

by Ian Stewart » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:15 am
john1234 wrote:During a 40 mile trip, Marla traveled at a average spped of x miles per hour for the first y miles of the trip and at an average speed of 1.25x miles per hour for the last 40-y miles of the trip.The time that Marla took to travel the 40 miles was what percent of the time it would have taken her if she had traveled at an average speed of x mile per hour for the entire trip?

1) x = 48
2) y = 20

It took me 3 minutes to solve this question.I need any help i can get on this.Ian and Stuart pls help.
An interesting question. The first observation I'd make: it's absolutely clear that you could answer the question with both statements, since then you'd know all of the numbers. That should certainly make you suspicious that one statement is actually sufficient alone. 1) is not enough, because we have no idea what y is, and y is clearly important here. If you see that, you're down to B and C as answer choices, and you could guess B and be correct most of the time (at least on more difficult questions), since C is 'too obvious'.

Still, I don't like guessing, so let's see why 2) is sufficient. You can certainly see this algebraically, but that isn't actually necessary. The numbers in the question confuse matters a bit, but the essential idea is this:

If it would take you t hours to travel d miles at speed s, then over d miles,
-if you travel at speed 2s, it will take t/2 hours (if you double your speed, you'll cut your time in half);
-if you travel at speed 3s, it will take t/3 hours (if you triple your speed, you divide your time by 3)
-if you travel at speed 1.25s = 5s/4, as in the question, your time will be 4t/5.

You can see this by plugging into the t = d/s equation.

So we know that for part of the trip, the part at 1.25x miles per hour, the time was 4/5ths of what it would have been had the speed simply been x. We only need to know for what fraction of the trip the time was reduced by this ratio- and Statement 2 tells us that the time was reduced for exactly half of the trip. So sufficient.

If you want the actual answer- say it would have taken t hours at speed x. The first half would normally take t/2 hours, but at speed 1.25x, it will take 4/5ths as long - 2t/5 hours. The second half, at speed x, takes t/2 hours. So if half the trip is completed at speed 1.25x, the other half at speed x, the time will be:

2t/5 + t/2 = 9t/10

At the given speeds, the total time will be 90% of what it would have been at speed x the entire trip.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by john1234 » Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:12 pm
Thanks a lot Ian.I just need to be careful not to waste time about stuff like this.
Even impossible says I M possible
Join the discussion