Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Short cut for this GMATPREP QUESTION

Expert replies
by john1234 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:49 am
During a 40 mile trip, Marla traveled at a average spped of x miles per hour for the first y miles of the trip and at an average speed of 1.25x miles per hour for the last 40-y miles of the trip.The time that Marla took to travel the 40 miles was what percent of the time it would have taken her if she had traveled at an average speed of x mile per hour for the entire trip?

1) x = 48
2) y = 20

It took me 3 minutes to solve this question.I need any help i can get on this.Ian and Stuart pls help.
Even impossible says I M possible
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by amitansu » Fri Aug 01, 2008 3:35 am
It takes a little while to formulate the equation, and then it becomes easier i guess..

According to question :

t1=y/x and t2=40-y/1.25x

total time=(t1+t2)=y/x+(40-y)/1.25x

and q asks the value of [y/x+(40-y)/1.25x]/40/x * 100
by solving we can get .25y+40/1.25 * 100 and this value is what is asked for.

Is the ans B here ?

Amit
Join the discussion

by john1234 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:40 pm
Yeah.OA is B. i solved it the way you did.But it took me some time to figure it out.
Thanx.
Even impossible says I M possible
Join the discussion

Re: Short cut for this GMATPREP QUESTION

by Ian Stewart » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:15 am
john1234 wrote:During a 40 mile trip, Marla traveled at a average spped of x miles per hour for the first y miles of the trip and at an average speed of 1.25x miles per hour for the last 40-y miles of the trip.The time that Marla took to travel the 40 miles was what percent of the time it would have taken her if she had traveled at an average speed of x mile per hour for the entire trip?

1) x = 48
2) y = 20

It took me 3 minutes to solve this question.I need any help i can get on this.Ian and Stuart pls help.
An interesting question. The first observation I'd make: it's absolutely clear that you could answer the question with both statements, since then you'd know all of the numbers. That should certainly make you suspicious that one statement is actually sufficient alone. 1) is not enough, because we have no idea what y is, and y is clearly important here. If you see that, you're down to B and C as answer choices, and you could guess B and be correct most of the time (at least on more difficult questions), since C is 'too obvious'.

Still, I don't like guessing, so let's see why 2) is sufficient. You can certainly see this algebraically, but that isn't actually necessary. The numbers in the question confuse matters a bit, but the essential idea is this:

If it would take you t hours to travel d miles at speed s, then over d miles,
-if you travel at speed 2s, it will take t/2 hours (if you double your speed, you'll cut your time in half);
-if you travel at speed 3s, it will take t/3 hours (if you triple your speed, you divide your time by 3)
-if you travel at speed 1.25s = 5s/4, as in the question, your time will be 4t/5.

You can see this by plugging into the t = d/s equation.

So we know that for part of the trip, the part at 1.25x miles per hour, the time was 4/5ths of what it would have been had the speed simply been x. We only need to know for what fraction of the trip the time was reduced by this ratio- and Statement 2 tells us that the time was reduced for exactly half of the trip. So sufficient.

If you want the actual answer- say it would have taken t hours at speed x. The first half would normally take t/2 hours, but at speed 1.25x, it will take 4/5ths as long - 2t/5 hours. The second half, at speed x, takes t/2 hours. So if half the trip is completed at speed 1.25x, the other half at speed x, the time will be:

2t/5 + t/2 = 9t/10

At the given speeds, the total time will be 90% of what it would have been at speed x the entire trip.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by john1234 » Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:12 pm
Thanks a lot Ian.I just need to be careful not to waste time about stuff like this.
Even impossible says I M possible
Join the discussion