BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Several financial officers

Expert replies

by gmat740 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:03 am
Guys!

I agree A is subjunctive mood. But....

What is wrong with E?
Join the discussion

by Top5bound » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:04 am
What's wrong with C?
The officers spoke (past tense). At the time the condition was made, it would have been future tense. However, the condition exists now (after officers spoke), so it should be present tense ("are" instead of "will", ruling out B). Also, the officers don't want their names printed (or used), so "names" is a better as a noun than a verb "be named".
Anbody agree with this?
Join the discussion

Re: Several financial officers

by real2008 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:43 am
ektamatta wrote:Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in
the press reports.
A. that they not be named
B. that their names will not be used
C. that their names are not used
D. of not having their names
E. of not naming them
as per choice a, it appears to me that financial officers will be given new name in the press conference, and thus option doesn't make sense

b: better to use the present tense.
c: perfectly ok

d: fo s are definitely having names, rather they want their names not be quoted
e: choice speaks about giving new name or something like that
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:16 pm
Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in the press reports.
A. that they not be named
B. that their names will not be used
C. that their names are not used
D. of not having their names
E. of not naming them
Condition>>Subjunctive reqd>>use "that".
Eliminate D,E

I think we can eliminate C on the grounds that the press reports will happen in the future..C uses present tense..

Explanations for A and B please!!

Oa is [spoiler][spoiler=]A[/spoiler][/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:58 pm
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:58 pm
this is from OG10

very hard for me

anyway I try to explain

"of not..." is not idiomatic

"will..." is wrong because there is no future here

"not be named..." mean "not spoken about" so meaning is wrong although subjuctive use is right.

C is left.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:58 pm
gmat expert, ple help us
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:35 am
huh lot of discussion, no expert yet chipin...I think its a good candidate for subjunctive ...and so option A make sense, w/o that it is really hard to cross several options.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by Psychodementia » Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:06 am
Let us presume you did not know this is subjunctive use then also there are other clues to help you.

"named in the press reports" is less ambiguos than "used in the press reports" (used to create the reports? used to bind the reports?).

This eliminates B and C

"Condition of X" will hold true is X is a noun and not a phrase such as "condition of anonymity" or "condition of the house" etc.

"Condition that X" however can be used when X is a pharse or rather in the event of X happening only then......

Hope this helps,

Arun
Join the discussion