BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Set 4 Q 11

Expert replies
by arocks » Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:43 am
If n and k are positive integers, is n divisible by 6?
(1) n = k(k + 1)(k - 1)
(2) k -1 is a multiple of 3.

For statement 1, I understand that it is sufficient because -
n is a product of three consecutive terms .
And the sum of three consecutive terms is always divisible by 6
But if k=1, then n=0. In such a case the statement-1 is not sufficient.
Please let me know if i am missing something here. The question doesn’t mention that k>1.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kajcha » Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:07 am
IMO A

Stmt 1 is suff as product of 3 consecutive integers will have 6 as a factor.

Stmt 2 does not give relation between k and n so NOT SUFF
Join the discussion

by ratindasgupta » Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:22 am
Statement 1 is sufficient.

the rule actually is that 0 is divisible by all nos. So if k is 0, n is 0. And thus divisible by 6.
Join the discussion

by camitava » Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:01 am
Guys I am agree with Rateen and Kajcha! Stmt 1 is having some meaning and that is 100% correct. So IMO A. But B is not having any meaning at all. It is talking about only the value of K! How come n will be related to that?
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion