in a sequence of integer numbers in which each term is the square of the preceeding term, what is the fourth term?
1. last term is 6561
2. first term is 3
sequence
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:57 am
- Location: mumbai, India
- Thanked: 5 times
I think stmt 2 is sufficient to answer the question. The reasoning follows:
In stsmt 1 only the last term is given. Now if one goes on calculating the square roots he will end up with 1. The catch lies here. Because the series does not exclude repeated numbers so there is a possibility that the series may have infinite no of 1 in the beginning.
While stsmt 2 is simple vanila. sart with 3 and keep squaring to get 4th term
In stsmt 1 only the last term is given. Now if one goes on calculating the square roots he will end up with 1. The catch lies here. Because the series does not exclude repeated numbers so there is a possibility that the series may have infinite no of 1 in the beginning.
While stsmt 2 is simple vanila. sart with 3 and keep squaring to get 4th term
"To do is to be"
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Actually, you'll get closer and closer and closer to 1, but you'll never get there.ikant wrote:I think stmt 2 is sufficient to answer the question. The reasoning follows:
In stsmt 1 only the last term is given. Now if one goes on calculating the square roots he will end up with 1. The catch lies here. Because the series does not exclude repeated numbers so there is a possibility that the series may have infinite no of 1 in the beginning.
While stsmt 2 is simple vanila. sart with 3 and keep squaring to get 4th term
Just knowing the last term gives us no information at all about the 4th term. For all we know, the sequence only has 4 terms and 6561 is the 4th term. It's also possible that 6561 is the 5th term and that the 4th term is root(6561). Of course, there are infinite other possibilities depending on how many terms the set actually has.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:05 pm
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:1 members
Why isn't it d?
ikant - '...so there is a possibility that the series may have infinite no of 1 in the beginning...'
--- it says that each term is the square of the preceding term, so we can't have ones otherwise we would never have anything but 1s in the sequence.
Stuart, you said that it's also possible that 6561 is the 5th term and that the 4th term is root(6561) or 81, that makes 3rd term 9, 2nd 3, and 1st root(3) which is not an integer anymore. With the last term being 6561, how can we have anything besides (3, 9, 81, 6561) or (-3, 9, 81, 6561)?
Am I seeing this wrong?
ikant - '...so there is a possibility that the series may have infinite no of 1 in the beginning...'
--- it says that each term is the square of the preceding term, so we can't have ones otherwise we would never have anything but 1s in the sequence.
Stuart, you said that it's also possible that 6561 is the 5th term and that the 4th term is root(6561) or 81, that makes 3rd term 9, 2nd 3, and 1st root(3) which is not an integer anymore. With the last term being 6561, how can we have anything besides (3, 9, 81, 6561) or (-3, 9, 81, 6561)?
Am I seeing this wrong?
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Doh! I missed the key word "integer" in the stem.xilef wrote:Why isn't it d?
Stuart, you said that it's also possible that 6561 is the 5th term and that the 4th term is root(6561) or 81, that makes 3rd term 9, 2nd 3, and 1st root(3) which is not an integer anymore. With the last term being 6561, how can we have anything besides (3, 9, 81, 6561) or (-3, 9, 81, 6561)?
Am I seeing this wrong?
You're 100% correct. If there are at least 4 terms, and if 6561 is the last term, then 6561 would have to be the 4th term.
I guess the issue is "does there have to be a 4th term?" If we can assume that there are at least 4 terms, then 6561 is definitely 4th. However, if a possible answer is "there is no 4th term", then 6561 could be the 3rd and final term of the sequence.
If the answer actually is (b) instead of (d), I'd be interested in the official explanation.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
- gabriel
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:07 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 51 times
- Followed by:1 members
But Stuart doesn't the question stem ask for a 4th term, So isnt it safe to infer that the sequence has at least 4 terms. I mean, the question and the statement are both obviously referring to the same sequence ... right??.Stuart Kovinsky wrote:....
I guess the issue is "does there have to be a 4th term?" If we can assume that there are at least 4 terms, then 6561 is definitely 4th. However, if a possible answer is "there is no 4th term", then 6561 could be the 3rd and final term of the sequence.
If the answer actually is (b) instead of (d), I'd be interested in the official explanation.
I too would be really interested in the original explanation ... Enginpasa could you please post the original explanation to this question ..
PS:.. Also do post the source of this question.
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Oh, I agree with you - the "there doesn't have to be a 4th term" explanation seems pretty weak to me, but it's the only way I can see that the answer wouldn't be (d).gabriel wrote: But Stuart doesn't the question stem ask for a 4th term, So isnt it safe to infer that the sequence has at least 4 terms. I mean, the question and the statement are both obviously referring to the same sequence ... right??.
I too would be really interested in the original explanation ... Enginpasa could you please post the original explanation to this question ..
PS:.. Also do post the source of this question.
I'd also be interested in the source of the question - it would be great if everyone always included the source, so we can better decide how valid the question is likely to be.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course