Timmy is learning about the war in which much of Europe will be reduced to rubble
A) Timmy is learning about the war in which much of Europe will be reduced to rubble
B) Timmy learned about the war in which much of Europe had been reduced to rubble
C) Timmy had learned about the war in which much of Europe was reduced to rubble
D) Timmy has learned about the war in which much of Europe must have been bee reduced to rubble
E) Timmy learned about the war in which much of Europe was reduced to rubble
According to Manhattan. the OA: E. In B, I argue that the sequence of events is a must. So Why B is wrong?[spoiler][/spoiler]
Sequence of events
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
At 10pm, John had finished dinner.Mo2men wrote:Timmy is learning about the war in which much of Europe will be reduced to rubble
A) Timmy is learning about the war in which much of Europe will be reduced to rubble
B) Timmy learned about the war in which much of Europe had been reduced to rubble
C) Timmy had learned about the war in which much of Europe was reduced to rubble
D) Timmy has learned about the war in which much of Europe must have been bee reduced to rubble
E) Timmy learned about the war in which much of Europe was reduced to rubble
According to Manhattan. the OA: E. In B, I argue that the sequence of events is a must. So Why B is wrong?[spoiler][/spoiler]
Conveyed meaning:
John finished dinner BEFORE 10PM, with the result that AT 10PM John HAD FINISHED dinner.
B: the war in which much of Europe had been reduced to rubble
Here, which serves to refer to the war, as follows:
In the war, much of Europe had been reduced to rubble.
Conveyed meaning:
Much of Europe was reduced to rubble BEFORE THE WAR, with result that IN THE WAR much of Europe HAD BEEN REDUCED to rubble.
Not the intended meaning.
The intended meaning is that much of Europe was reduced to rubble not before the war but IN the war, as conveyed by the OA:
the war in which much of Europe was reduced to rubble.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Dear Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:
At 10pm, John had finished dinner.
Conveyed meaning:
John finished dinner BEFORE 10PM, with the result that AT 10PM John HAD FINISHED dinner.
Thanks for your support.
What is difference between the following:
At 10pm, John had finished dinner.
By 10pm, John had finished dinner.
Can we accept the elimination based on the following from Manhattan SC book?
"Do not use the perfect tenses when the simple tenses will do. The GMAT prefers simplicity.
Wrong: Joe LEARNED about an epoch in which dinosaurs HAD WALKED the earth.
Right: Joe LEARNED about an epoch in which dinosaurs WALKED the earth.
In the first example, the Past Perfect had walked is unnecessary. Although the action had walked does take place earlier than the action learned, the earlier action does not have a direct bearing on the context of the later action. The sequence of time does not need to be clarified or emphasized. Thus, the Past Perfect is considered wrong in this context."
Thanks
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The red modifier refers to the hours BEFORE THE CLOCK STRUCK 10PM.Mo2men wrote:What is difference between the following:
At 10pm, John had finished dinner.
By 10pm, John had finished dinner.
At some point during this time period -- perhaps at 8pm, perhaps at 9pm -- John finished dinner.
The exact moment is unknown.
We know only that the process of finishing dinner was completed before the clock struck 10pm.
The blue modifier refers to John's situation WHEN THE CLOCK STRUCK 10PM.
At this moment, John was no longer finishing dinner.
Looks good.Can we accept the elimination based on the following from Manhattan SC book?
"Do not use the perfect tenses when the simple tenses will do. The GMAT prefers simplicity.
Wrong: Joe LEARNED about an epoch in which dinosaurs HAD WALKED the earth.
Right: Joe LEARNED about an epoch in which dinosaurs WALKED the earth.
In the first example, the Past Perfect had walked is unnecessary. Although the action had walked does take place earlier than the action learned, the earlier action does not have a direct bearing on the context of the later action. The sequence of time does not need to be clarified or emphasized. Thus, the Past Perfect is considered wrong in this context."
Thanks
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3