-
fiza gupta
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:55 pm
- Location: Punjab
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:7 members
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.
(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their
unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owned to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their
unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owned to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
Fiza Gupta
