BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 2015 - In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled

Expert replies
by fiza gupta » Sun Oct 09, 2016 2:03 am
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their
unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owned to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
Fiza Gupta
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by crackverbal » Mon Oct 10, 2016 4:12 am
Let us look at each of the answer options -
A- correct answer.
B- Usage of 'their' is incorrect. In a clause, the same pronouns must have the same antecedent.
Let us take a look at this example -
While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their equity -in many cases representing a life's savings-can plunge or even disappear.
In this case 'they' refers to 'depressed property values'; 'their' refers to 'homeowners' - two different things. Hence, Incorrect.
Similarly in B - "because of their unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century." Here, the first "their" refers to counties; the second 'their' refers to Oneida Indians. Incorrect.
C - Same problem as in B with "their". "ruled two upstate NY counties" absurdly implies that the Supreme court ruled those counties.
D - same problem with pronouns."rule on X" means to give a decision or judgment about X. for example - "the court ruled on the motion". D uses this idiom incorrectly. the court cannot rule on counties.
E- unacceptable change of meaning. It implies that restitution was already owed before the court's ruling. It does not tell us what the court's decision was? A makes the court's decision clear - the court ruled that restitution was owed.
Join Free 4 part MBA Through GMAT Video Training Series here -
https://gmat.crackverbal.com/mba-throug ... video-2018

Enroll for our GMAT Trial Course here -
https://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Mon Oct 10, 2016 4:42 pm
fiza gupta wrote:In a 5-to-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of their ancestral lands in the eighteenth century.

(A) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
(B) that two upstate New York counties owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because of their
unlawful seizure of
(C) two upstate New York counties to owe restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians for their unlawful seizure of
D) on two upstate New York counties that owed restitution to three tribes of Oneida Indians because they unlawfully seized
E) on the restitution that two upstate New York counties owned to three tribes of Oneida Indians for the unlawful seizure of
Hi Fiza,

Whenever you post please do post the OA by putting it into the spoiler.
Please also mention the source of the question. This will drive more attention of the experts.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by fiza gupta » Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:34 pm
Richa,

thanks for pointing my mistake, will take care next time.
But source i have mentioned in the subject OG-2015

for above question OA:A
Fiza Gupta
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1