BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Scotch

Expert replies
by reply2spg » Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:05 am
The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.

The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?

A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.

B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.

C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.

D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.

E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.

OA Later
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Prashantbhardwaj » Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:22 am
It feels like a close tie between C and D.

But the Argument tells that the quality of the whisky is derived from its components. But not about how it is derived.

As option D helps me find out how that derivation works and the result thus will be opposite two what the author states here.

D is the answer.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:13 am
Prashantbhardwaj wrote:D is the answer.
You are right
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:50 am
reply2spg wrote:The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.

The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?

A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.

B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.

C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.

D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.

E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.

OA Later
I did not get this question.

Can somebody explain the why the credited answer is correct?
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:04 pm
IMO D

simple :

You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A

So avg rating = 6

D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6

clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
Join the discussion

by SmarpanGamt » Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:47 pm
FightWithGMAT wrote:
reply2spg wrote:The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.

The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?

A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.

B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.

C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.

D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.

E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.

OA Later

I did not get this question.

Can somebody explain the why the credited answer is correct?
My method of reasoning was
Conclusion " MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies"

How can finest be average : If 5 finest malt whisky make one average blend whisky , option D suggest fine blended whisky is an average qaulity, than finest Macduff whisky is not a finest whisky - that is not the conclusion.

Thanks for posting this question : Now I can make difference in BP and JD. JD is Single malt premium stoch and BP is blended whisky.:)
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:39 am
paes wrote:IMO D

simple :

You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A

So avg rating = 6

D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6

clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
Hey Thanks Man!!!
Awesome is your maths!!! I got the clue from ur explanation :)

Actually, the argument says that quality of a blend is proportional to that of its components.

D denies this, saying that such proportionality does not exists.
Rather
quality of a blend is linked to the AVERAGE of the qualities of its components.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:41 am
FightWithGMAT wrote:
paes wrote:IMO D

simple :

You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A

So avg rating = 6

D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6

clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
Hey Thanks Man!!!
Awesome is your maths!!! I got the clue from ur explanation :)

Actually, the argument says that quality of a blend is proportional to that of its components.

D denies this, saying that such proportionality does not exists.
Rather
quality of a blend is linked to the AVERAGE of the qualities of its components.
GMAC... you are very tricky the way you phrase questions and answer choices.
Join the discussion

by ikaplan » Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:57 am
I was stuck between C and D. I read the question again and I try to find out why I should have eliminated C in the first place. The stem says 'no fewer than 5'. It means exactly 5 but not less right? If the latter is true, than C can be eliminated for exaggeration (more than five is out of scope). I would be grateful if someone can clarify my reasoning.
"Commitment is more than just wishing for the right conditions. Commitment is working with what you have."
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:11 am
Could u pls reveal the source ?
Join the discussion

by ov25 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:33 pm
@ikaplan
it is critical to distinguish between world's finesh whiskies (WFWs) and finesh whisky in the world (FWW)

WFWs come from scotland.

The new whiskey blends =5 or greater than 5 of WFWs.

The assumption here is FWW is rated > WFW's each are.
Assumption 2 is that the 5 or more that were blended to get FWW, have top rating among all WFWs.

Best case scenario, If =5, even if all the 5 WFWs are rated 10/10, FWW=10
>5 can only get worser.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by prashant misra » Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:48 am
i was confused between C and D but i chose the wrong answer option C.i am still not getting it cna anyone please explain it to me in more detail.
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:02 pm
IMO D
reply2spg wrote:The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.

The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?

A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.

B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.

C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.

D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.

E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.

OA Later
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:39 pm
Very easy one. IMO D. For two reason:

If 5 finest whiskies have different rank. The average will lower than the highest rank.

If 5 finest whiskies have same rank. For example, #1, why they did not sell 5 different whiskies rather than combine them.
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:42 pm
edirik wrote:Sorry but I did not understand how you get to the 10. Mean is 6 Ok, but how do you come up with the 10?
paes wrote:IMO D

simple :

You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A

So avg rating = 6

D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6

clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
Nope, 6<8. He type error :D
Join the discussion