Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planet-wide destruction.
A. and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but
B. and, if it would strike Earth, part of the planet could experience a tremendous amount of damage but it would
C. and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would
D. and that, if Earth is struck by it, can do part of the planet tremendous damage, but it would
E. and that, if it strikes Earth, it could experience a tremendous amount of damage but
[spoiler]OA: My question is whether the usage of would & could in the same sentence correct???????[/spoiler]
Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is a
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
- Ozlemg
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
- Thanked: 25 times
- Followed by:7 members
my 2 cents : Gmat makers do not like if with can.
And if "could" indicates possibility, can be used with would
my answer is E
And if "could" indicates possibility, can be used with would
my answer is E
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
My inputs-aspirant2011 wrote:Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planet-wide destruction.
C. and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would
[spoiler]OA: My question is whether the usage of would & could in the same sentence correct???????[/spoiler]
We need to understand that "could" comes from CAN and "would" comes from WILL
So where we have a factor of uncertainity we use could. But, where we have conditional, we use would.
In this the scientist are sure that it won't b a planet wide destruction BUT it could do tremendous damage on the part where it strikes !!
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 8:05 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 8:05 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:39 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:27 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
Here we are talking about the HYPOTHETICAL situation.ranjithreddy.k9 wrote:What is wrong with A??
So we need to use the IF IT WERE construction.
I hope it is clear
Thanks