Scientists claim that the discovery of the first authenticated mammal bones in amber could provide important clues of determining, in addition to how, when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies.
A. of determining, in addition to how, when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies
B. in the determination of how and when the islands of the West Indies were colonized by mammals
C. to determine how mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies and when they did
D. for determining when the islands of the West Indies were colonized by mammals and how they were
E. for determining how and when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies
Scientists claim that the discovery of the first
This topic has expert replies
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Option A: [NOT TRUE]
A direct unevaluated statement lacking in vigor and the desired inferential ability. It does not provide the need information.
Option B: TRUE
Here, a straightforward sentence with weight and strength that briefly connects two adverbs of "how" and "when" both adverbs of reason and time respectively. It prepares the reader or the audience ahead. It appears the most correct of all.
Option C: Not True
It is likewise a correct option as well but it could have been better arranged for better grammatical understanding as in option B above.
Option D: Not True
The use of 'for' makes the statement over-specified and more ambiguous. It does infer that the entire action was schemed because of the Mammals herein.
Option E: Not True
Sounds correct also but not the most accurate or do we say it's not as accurate as option B above.
A direct unevaluated statement lacking in vigor and the desired inferential ability. It does not provide the need information.
Option B: TRUE
Here, a straightforward sentence with weight and strength that briefly connects two adverbs of "how" and "when" both adverbs of reason and time respectively. It prepares the reader or the audience ahead. It appears the most correct of all.
Option C: Not True
It is likewise a correct option as well but it could have been better arranged for better grammatical understanding as in option B above.
Option D: Not True
The use of 'for' makes the statement over-specified and more ambiguous. It does infer that the entire action was schemed because of the Mammals herein.
Option E: Not True
Sounds correct also but not the most accurate or do we say it's not as accurate as option B above.