Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

School Survey

Expert replies
by imskpwr » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:51 am
According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services.

Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams.

Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past.

OA after discussions.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by niketdoshi123 » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:05 pm
imskpwr wrote:According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services.

Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams.

Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past.

OA after discussions.
This is a cause => effect question.
Cause: Increased spirituality at the college.
Effect: massively reduced cheating incidences on exams.

To weaken the conclusion we need to look for a choice that suggests an alternative cause.
Option C suggests that its because of involvement of closely monitored faculty-proctored exams, the college has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams.
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:40 pm
niketdoshi123 wrote:
imskpwr wrote:According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services.

Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams.

Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past.

OA after discussions.
This is a cause => effect question.
Cause: Increased spirituality at the college.
Effect: massively reduced cheating incidences on exams.

To weaken the conclusion we need to look for a choice that suggests an alternative cause.
Option C suggests that its because of involvement of closely monitored faculty-proctored exams, the college has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams.
If 15 years ago a stringent role has been applied, then how come cheating has decreased over last 10 years (Can have a look at the passage BOLD part). IMO C cannot be the answer.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:50 am
shovan85 wrote:
niketdoshi123 wrote:
imskpwr wrote:According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services.

Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams.

Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past.

OA after discussions.
This is a cause => effect question.
Cause: Increased spirituality at the college.
Effect: massively reduced cheating incidences on exams.

To weaken the conclusion we need to look for a choice that suggests an alternative cause.
Option C suggests that its because of involvement of closely monitored faculty-proctored exams, the college has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams.
If 15 years ago a stringent role has been applied, then how come cheating has decreased over last 10 years (Can have a look at the passage BOLD part). IMO C cannot be the answer.
So wat's your pick.
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Thu Jul 26, 2012 3:02 am
imskpwr wrote:According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

A) Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

B) Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services. ( Good that spirituality is felt but not related to the argument)

C) Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams. (Timeline mismatch: If 15 years ago a stringent role has been applied, then how come cheating has decreased over last 10 years)

D) Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

E) Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past. (Not related to the argument)

OA after discussions.
Left with A and D. As far as D is concerned, NOT ALL STUDENTS - that means with data from LESS students who attend the services, gives the survey a claim saying it's decreasing the incidences of cheating! So, if the survey includes all students, that will STRENGTHEN the argument. D strengthens the Argument here. Left out is A.

If we analyze A, Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons. It says Campus Services, not Religious services of the campus. There can be other services as well. So, for reduced incidences of cheating reason cannot be Spirituality.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Thu Jul 26, 2012 6:05 am
shovan85 wrote:
imskpwr wrote:According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

A) Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

B) Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services. ( Good that spirituality is felt but not related to the argument)

C) Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams. (Timeline mismatch: If 15 years ago a stringent role has been applied, then how come cheating has decreased over last 10 years)

D) Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

E) Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past. (Not related to the argument)

OA after discussions.
Left with A and D. As far as D is concerned, NOT ALL STUDENTS - that means with data from LESS students who attend the services, gives the survey a claim saying it's decreasing the incidences of cheating! So, if the survey includes all students, that will STRENGTHEN the argument. D strengthens the Argument here. Left out is A.

If we analyze A, Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons. It says Campus Services, not Religious services of the campus. There can be other services as well. So, for reduced incidences of cheating reason cannot be Spirituality.
Not getting how A is a weakener?
I chose C because I had no other choice left.
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:13 am
imskpwr wrote:Not getting how A is a weakener?
I chose C because I had no other choice left.
I understand this problem can be solved by POE. However, when you are dealing with Percentage and when you see strong words as MUST, you have to be cautious.

PERCENTAGE - You do not know how many students are in the religious service. For instance there were 1000 students in Total and Religious service had 10 in it (before 10 years). Now, if the Total student strength still stays 1000, then number of students in the service will be 15. Does this number make an impact on morale of students?

MUST- As, option A says, students can be in "Campus services" - it can be various (might be a service which is about demerits of cheating in exam). So, we cannot narrow it down to only Religious Services (so as the Spirituality).
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:42 am
shovan85 wrote:
imskpwr wrote:Not getting how A is a weakener?
I chose C because I had no other choice left.
I understand this problem can be solved by POE. However, when you are dealing with Percentage and when you see strong words as MUST, you have to be cautious.

MUST- As, option A says, students can be in "Campus services" - it can be various (might be a service which is about demerits of cheating in exam). So, we cannot narrow it down to only Religious Services (so as the Spirituality).

A) Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons

You are deducing that there may be MANY "services": campus services, religious services, etc.
MOST of the students who now attend campus services do so for social reasons.
so how can we ASSUME that it could be CAMPUS SERVICES for such increased "Spirituality".
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:06 am
imskpwr wrote:
shovan85 wrote:
imskpwr wrote:Not getting how A is a weakener?
I chose C because I had no other choice left.
I understand this problem can be solved by POE. However, when you are dealing with Percentage and when you see strong words as MUST, you have to be cautious.

MUST- As, option A says, students can be in "Campus services" - it can be various (might be a service which is about demerits of cheating in exam). So, we cannot narrow it down to only Religious Services (so as the Spirituality).

A) Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons

You are deducing that there may be MANY "services": campus services, religious services, etc.
MOST of the students who now attend campus services do so for social reasons.
so how can we ASSUME that it could be CAMPUS SERVICES for such increased "Spirituality".
Yes! And also, most students attend services for social reasons, and not religious reasons, that would seriously weaken the author's argument.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by umeshpatil » Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:54 pm
Premise: Attendance for religious services INCREASED by 50% within 10 years.

Conclusion: Spirituality responsible for voidance of cheating.

Links used for conclusion:
(attend religious services)--> (gain spirituality)---> (avoid cheating)

We need to disconnect the link (not attacking the statement itself) . Option B does this. My answer: B.
Join the discussion

by Indianblondienyc » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:25 pm
My Answer Is D.whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by Ludacrispat26 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:32 am
imskpwr wrote:According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services.

Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams.

Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past.

OA after discussions.
C, easily. The inference is a hypothesis about the causal factor behind a decreased rate of cheating. C gives another compelling possibility as to why spirituality may not be the causal factor (i.e. because increased monitoring during exams is actually the causal factor).
Don't stop believin'...
Join the discussion

by tisrar02 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:43 pm
A, B, D and E all seem so irrelevant to me. C is the only one that actually speaks about the topic being asked.
Join the discussion

by confuse mind » Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:16 pm
IMO - C

College shifted to proctored exams 15 years back and the benefits from that started coming and the results can be witnessed in the time-frame of 15 years.

The improvement and the change is a gradual process and not an overnight thing.

If we analyze the data of last 10 years there was significant change and improvement.

OA -? please
Join the discussion

by Practicegmat » Sun Aug 05, 2012 5:52 am
imskpwr wrote:
shovan85 wrote:
imskpwr wrote:According to a recent school survey, the number of students who regularly attend religious services on campus has increased 50 percent from the figure 10 years ago. It must be an increased spirituality at our college that has massively reduced incidences of cheating on exams during this period.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the inference above?

A) Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons.

B) Spirituality can be expressed and felt without attendance at regular religious services. ( Good that spirituality is felt but not related to the argument)

C) Fifteen years ago, the college switched from an honor system to one involving closely monitored faculty-proctored exams. (Timeline mismatch: If 15 years ago a stringent role has been applied, then how come cheating has decreased over last 10 years)

D) Not all students who attend religious services regularly on campus responded to the survey.

E) Cheating has not been a major problem at this school in the past. (Not related to the argument)

OA after discussions.
Left with A and D. As far as D is concerned, NOT ALL STUDENTS - that means with data from LESS students who attend the services, gives the survey a claim saying it's decreasing the incidences of cheating! So, if the survey includes all students, that will STRENGTHEN the argument. D strengthens the Argument here. Left out is A.

If we analyze A, Most of the students who now attend campus services do so largely for social reasons. It says Campus Services, not Religious services of the campus. There can be other services as well. So, for reduced incidences of cheating reason cannot be Spirituality.
Not getting how A is a weakener?
I chose C because I had no other choice left.
In many of the posts I find that users say "OA after the discussions" , but finally they are never "clear" about it.

Hello imskpwr, Please be clear about whether (A) is the OA or not
Thanks
Join the discussion