BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Vivien Thomas!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:06 am
Vivien Thomas, who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became a cardiac surgeon and eventually to receive an honorary doctorate from Johns Hopkins University.

(A) who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became
(B) having had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds to become
(C) who, having no formal medical training, he struggled against overwhelming odds in becoming
(D) who, having had no formal medical training and struggled against overwhelming odds, became
(E) who had no formal medical training, struggled against overwhelming odds to become

Is there any example where "XX who + COMMA -ING" is correct?

Or is it always wrong to use "XX who + COMMA -ING"?

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:18 am
to receive needs to be parallel with to become.
ACD out.

having is modifying Vivien in B which is wrong. Also the sentence looks awkward.

IMO E
Join the discussion

by Haaress » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:49 pm
1 more for E
Join the discussion

by manjitzing » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:53 am
"to receive an honorary doctorate" should be in parallel with 'to became a cardiac surgeon '.. So we have narrowed down to B and E.
In B, sentence is seems like lacking the subject--a bit awkward.
So, E wins
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:36 am
gmat_perfect wrote:Vivien Thomas, who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became a cardiac surgeon and eventually to receive an honorary doctorate from Johns Hopkins University.

(A) who had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds, he became
(B) having had no formal medical training, in struggling against overwhelming odds to become
(C) who, having no formal medical training, he struggled against overwhelming odds in becoming
(D) who, having had no formal medical training and struggled against overwhelming odds, became
(E) who had no formal medical training, struggled against overwhelming odds to become

Is there any example where "XX who + COMMA -ING" is correct?

Or is it always wrong to use "XX who + COMMA -ING"?

Thanks.
IMO E
I don't know about any such rule.
But this is a straight problem,
Why are you looking for such strange rule ?
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:43 am
Addition to your explanation we need a past tense of struggle. Therefore only A and E remains. A can be eliminated as explained by kvcpk. So the answer is E
kvcpk wrote:to receive needs to be parallel with to become.
ACD out.

having is modifying Vivien in B which is wrong. Also the sentence looks awkward.

IMO E
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1