Work that is not finished is not work at all, it is merely a botch, a failure.
A. all, it is merely a botch, a failure.
B. all, it is a botch merely, and a failure.
C. all; it is merely a botch, a failure.
D. all; the work merely is a botch and a failure.
E. all; the work being merely a botch, a failure.
OA after discussion.
Happy Thoughts
SC-Work
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:41 am
- awesomeusername
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:27 pm
- Thanked: 23 times
- Followed by:1 members
My intuition says (C). "a failure" properly modifies "a botch". This is a case of a noun modifying another noun.
It can't be (E) because semicolons are used to separate two clauses. There is no verb in the second clause.
To use "the work" instead of the pronoun "it" makes it sound repetitive and wordy. So (D) is out.
"Botch merely" is incorrect. So (B) is out.
You can't separate two clauses with just a comma. So (A) is out.
It can't be (E) because semicolons are used to separate two clauses. There is no verb in the second clause.
To use "the work" instead of the pronoun "it" makes it sound repetitive and wordy. So (D) is out.
"Botch merely" is incorrect. So (B) is out.
You can't separate two clauses with just a comma. So (A) is out.
Constant dripping hollows out a stone.
-Lucretius
-Lucretius
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:32 am
- Thanked: 16 times
A,B -- run on setences.mail.SuhailSharma wrote:Work that is not finished is not work at all, it is merely a botch, a failure.
A. all, it is merely a botch, a failure.
B. all, it is a botch merely, and a failure.
C. all; it is merely a botch, a failure.
D. all; the work merely is a botch and a failure.
E. all; the work being merely a botch, a failure.
OA after discussion.
Happy Thoughts
E - being wrong
D -- wordy. "the work" can be replaced by "it"
C is the best.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 12 times
Agree with Cx2suresh wrote:A,B -- run on setences.mail.SuhailSharma wrote:Work that is not finished is not work at all, it is merely a botch, a failure.
A. all, it is merely a botch, a failure.
B. all, it is a botch merely, and a failure.
C. all; it is merely a botch, a failure.
D. all; the work merely is a botch and a failure.
E. all; the work being merely a botch, a failure.
OA after discussion.
Happy Thoughts
E - being wrong
D -- wordy. "the work" can be replaced by "it"
C is the best.
Suhail,
You are posting a really good questions.
Keep it up. but can you please let us know the source?
Thanks mate !
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:37 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
100% (C)
GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
A. all, it is merely a botch, a failure.
C. all; it is merely a botch, a failure.
I am really confused between A and C . Can some one please explain the difference and what is run on sentence.
Thanks in advance
C. all; it is merely a botch, a failure.
I am really confused between A and C . Can some one please explain the difference and what is run on sentence.
Thanks in advance
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:04 am
- Thanked: 3 times
i am hundred percent sure about C
logic-
after at all, a semicolon must be used to state a following sentence which on its own is also meaningful
A,B are eliminated because of the missing semicolon
among C D and E only C is grammatically consistent
logic-
after at all, a semicolon must be used to state a following sentence which on its own is also meaningful
A,B are eliminated because of the missing semicolon
among C D and E only C is grammatically consistent
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:09 am
- Location: Louisville, KY
- Thanked: 8 times
I also agree with C. The sentence can be logically broken into different sentences, but since it is not the ';' must be present.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:41 am