BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sc 'whose/which'

Expert replies
by beingAndNothing » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:03 pm
This is a question from the Princeton Review.

Many of America's political allies have demanded that the United States
repeal the Helms-Burton law of 1996, tightening the embargo on all Cuban
products and, according to opponents of it, violating
several international
agreements.

1) tightening the embargo on all Cuban products and, according to opponents of it, violating

2) whose tightening the embargo on all Cuban products violates, according to opponents of it,

3) which tightens the embargo on all Cuban products and which, according to opponents of it, violates

4)embargo's tightening by the Helms-Burton law of 1996 on all Cuban products and the violating, according to opponents of it, of

5)tightening the embargo of the Helms-Burton law of 1996 on all Cuban products and, according to its opponents, violating


OA is 3


I chose (2) because I thought the tightening violates the international treaties. The explanation in the book says that whose should be used for persons. But my understanding is that whose can be used as a possessive pronoun for which or who. Also, does the placement of the modifier 'according to its' before or after 'violates' makes a difference.

thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by camitava » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:44 pm
beingAndNothing, I will go for C. Look in the Qs, they are talking about the Helms-Burton law of 1996. Its true that we generally use WHOSE to indicate person/ animal/ living substance. Now the Qs wants to say that America repeals the Helms-Burton law of 1996 which tightens the embargo on all Cuban products. According to opponents, this also violates several international agreements. R u getting me? I mean what u understood from the Qs, its not that. So the best option to chose is C.
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Join the discussion

by sujaysolanki » Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:31 am
Just to add to what camitava has said ..the other way of looking at it is that

which here is acthing an essential clause that cannot be omitted in the sentence ...the only option that has it is C and besides that the concept being tested here is parallelism is only present in C and E ..but E does not use which so can be knocked off ..

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by beingAndNothing » Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:27 am
camitava and sujay:

thanks.
Join the discussion

by specialk1975 » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:55 am
Just look at the phrase "Helms-Burton law". Yes it is named after 2 people, but it is actually referencing the law, not the people, so "which" would appropriate.
Join the discussion

by Danielle » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:02 pm
Okay, when you look at this one, you can tell that the whole "tightening...and violating" underlined phrase is meant to describe the Helms-Burton law. But that is not what it is actually doing in the example sentence. The example sentence actually reads that America's political allies are doing the "tightening and violating". This is incorrect. The sentence needs a which/that/who restrictive clause word to differentiate the clause from the sentence and refer to the Helms-Burton law, which is the subject of the phrase. Right away you can eliminate 1, 4, and 5. (Or A, D and E).

Now it's a matter of picking the right word. It can't be B because whose can't refer to a law, even if it's named after it's Senate creators. That leaves C. C also doesn't have any grammatical errors, so it's the best answer.
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1