BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

sc 'whose/which'

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:35 am
Thanked: 1 times
by beingAndNothing » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:03 pm
This is a question from the Princeton Review.

Many of America's political allies have demanded that the United States
repeal the Helms-Burton law of 1996, tightening the embargo on all Cuban
products and, according to opponents of it, violating several international
agreements.

1) tightening the embargo on all Cuban products and, according to opponents of it, violating

2) whose tightening the embargo on all Cuban products violates, according to opponents of it,

3) which tightens the embargo on all Cuban products and which, according to opponents of it, violates

4)embargo's tightening by the Helms-Burton law of 1996 on all Cuban products and the violating, according to opponents of it, of

5)tightening the embargo of the Helms-Burton law of 1996 on all Cuban products and, according to its opponents, violating


OA is 3


I chose (2) because I thought the tightening violates the international treaties. The explanation in the book says that whose should be used for persons. But my understanding is that whose can be used as a possessive pronoun for which or who. Also, does the placement of the modifier 'according to its' before or after 'violates' makes a difference.

thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:37 amFollowed by: 5 members
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times

by camitava » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:44 pm
beingAndNothing, I will go for C. Look in the Qs, they are talking about the Helms-Burton law of 1996. Its true that we generally use WHOSE to indicate person/ animal/ living substance. Now the Qs wants to say that America repeals the Helms-Burton law of 1996 which tightens the embargo on all Cuban products. According to opponents, this also violates several international agreements. R u getting me? I mean what u understood from the Qs, its not that. So the best option to chose is C.
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:30 am
Thanked: 15 times

by sujaysolanki » Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:31 am
Just to add to what camitava has said ..the other way of looking at it is that

which here is acthing an essential clause that cannot be omitted in the sentence ...the only option that has it is C and besides that the concept being tested here is parallelism is only present in C and E ..but E does not use which so can be knocked off ..

Hope this helps
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:35 am
Thanked: 1 times

by beingAndNothing » Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:27 am
camitava and sujay:

thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:30 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by specialk1975 » Wed Jan 02, 2008 9:55 am
Just look at the phrase "Helms-Burton law". Yes it is named after 2 people, but it is actually referencing the law, not the people, so "which" would appropriate.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times

by Danielle » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:02 pm
Okay, when you look at this one, you can tell that the whole "tightening...and violating" underlined phrase is meant to describe the Helms-Burton law. But that is not what it is actually doing in the example sentence. The example sentence actually reads that America's political allies are doing the "tightening and violating". This is incorrect. The sentence needs a which/that/who restrictive clause word to differentiate the clause from the sentence and refer to the Helms-Burton law, which is the subject of the phrase. Right away you can eliminate 1, 4, and 5. (Or A, D and E).

Now it's a matter of picking the right word. It can't be B because whose can't refer to a law, even if it's named after it's Senate creators. That leaves C. C also doesn't have any grammatical errors, so it's the best answer.
Verbal Tutor
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1