BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Letters

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 48 times
by vinay1983 » Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:38 pm
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886,
outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

Correct option : Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

My query is how can the usage of "which " here be correct, since it should modify letters and not Dickinson!

Is this a rare property of which usage?
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pmFollowed by: 511 members
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Sun Sep 08, 2013 12:51 am
Hi vinay1983,

The word "which" IS modifying "letters"; you have to read the whole phrase "letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson" to see it. Here, the noun is "letters", not "Dickinson"

This is not a common presentation of modification, but it is still correct.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pmFollowed by: 20 members
Thanked: 42 times

by sana.noor » Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:51 am
"which" is used to refer a noun and what is the noun here? use "slash and burn" procedure
Emily Dickinson's letters (we arnt talking about emily neither dickinson but about letters)
to Susan Huntington Dickinson....which were written

letters are plural...were is used after "which" so automatically we know that this "were" isnt for dickinson but for letters. "which were" is modifying letters. when ever in doubt, look for the verb usd after "which"

we are actually talking about letters, so main subject is letters not dickinson

i hope this helps
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:35 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Edison
Thanked: 12 times

by ani781 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:06 am
Hi Sana ,
Can u please tell me what is a "slash and burn" procedure ?

Thanks!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pmFollowed by: 20 members
Thanked: 42 times

by sana.noor » Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:32 pm
slash and burn procedure is to remove all prepositional phrases and modifying phrases
in the above example i remove "tosusan huntington dickson
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written [spoiler]over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886,[/spoiler] outnumber her letters to anyone else. now read this simple sentence and u will understand that why using "which were" and "outnumber" is correct.
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 3:22 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 7 times

by \'manpreet singh » Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:29 am
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

Remember we know that which modifies the noun before it.
Here "to Susan Dickinson" is a prepositional phrase and it cannot be modified by which, so the noun that "which" modifies is the " letters".So its Usage is fine.and also as Sana pointed out correctly you can check the verb after "which" in this case it is "were" .Thus we know that "which" is correctly modifying plural noun(letters) here.

---------------------------------------------------
"Good things come to those who wait... greater things come to those who get off their ass and do anything to make it happen."
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1