BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!

We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC Q. 73, OG 10:: The British Admirality

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:52 pm
by sharkin » Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:48 am
[quote']The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize
Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.
(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C) what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it[/quote]

as per the OG explanation ::
  • 'them' in (A) & (B) has no antecedent - can it possibly refer to the Russian?
  • 'would' in option (B) needs to be 'should' - why?
  • kindly comment on the usage - 'necessary militarily' in option (C)...
thanks in advance,
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 56 times

by mundasingh123 » Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:42 am
sharkin wrote:[quote']The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize
Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.
(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C) what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it
as per the OG explanation ::
  • 'them' in (A) & (B) has no antecedent - can it possibly refer to the Russian?
  • 'would' in option (B) needs to be 'should' - why?
  • kindly comment on the usage - 'necessary militarily' in option (C)...
thanks in advance,[/quote]
The only plural entity present in the sentence is "The British Admiralty and the War Office "
Now "they should refer to "The British Admiralty and the War Office "
Apart from this plural entity there is no other plular entity present.
"Russians " word is not there in the sentence.Only attempt which is singular.
So A & B are out.
E) The necessity changes the meaning of the sentence.
C also changes the meaning of the sentence because of the word necessary.
So D .What is the OA?Kindly reveal the OA
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: Delhi,India
Thanked: 1 times

by puneetdua » Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:02 am
hi,

I don't understand the use of should inplace of would in B , i rejected it because of 'them'.
In option C 'neccessary militry for deaaling' is awkward.

IMO D , can you please tell us the OA.

Thanks
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 56 times

by mundasingh123 » Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:10 am
puneetdua wrote:hi,

I don't understand the use of should inplace of would in B , i rejected it because of 'them'.
In option C 'neccessary militry for deaaling' is awkward.

IMO D , can you please tell us the OA.

Thanks
awkardness is a not a good reason for rejecting an option
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 9:57 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by vinodsundaram » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:51 am
In C , dealing is not parallel to seize. So C out.

"a possible Russian attempt" is a noun. Cannot be referred by them. And B out.
The British Admiralty and the War Office met to consider x and y

Hence D :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pmFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 99 times

by vk_vinayak » Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:56 am
The main culprit in C is 'for dealing'. We need 'in order to deal'.
Also, as someone pointed out, 'necessary militarily' is awkward (I am not sure if it is grammatically incorrect)

D looks correct.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:19 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by mv12 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:12 pm
Apart from C and D others can be ruled out.

in D ..in order to ..is redundant so..C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:10 am

by a_new_beginning » Wed Sep 09, 2015 3:18 am
Can any expert help us here.

Please I could not find a thorough analysis of options on any of the Forums.

Please if any of the experts can attend this question.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:50 am
Thanked: 11 times

by thang » Wed Oct 21, 2015 6:28 am
sharkin wrote:[quote']The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize
Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.
(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C) what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it
as per the OG explanation ::
  • 'them' in (A) & (B) has no antecedent - can it possibly refer to the Russian?
  • 'would' in option (B) needs to be 'should' - why?
  • kindly comment on the usage - 'necessary militarily' in option (C)...
thanks in advance,[/quote]

only what in choice C and D are paralel logically to attempt.
neccesary militarily is unclear in C though we will see that it is hard to realize this unclearness

I can not refuse "neccessary for doing" because in the dictionary, "neccessary for +noun" is presented.
looking for the girl living in Bradford UK, visiting Halong bay, Vietnam on 26- 27 Jan 2014. all persons, pls, forward this message to all persons you know to help me find her: my email: [email protected], call: 84904812758
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:10 am
sharkin wrote:The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.

(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them
(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary
(C) what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event
(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event
(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it
In A and B, them (pronoun) cannot serve to refer to Russian (adjective).
Eliminate A and B.

C: what would be necessary militarily
The WAR OFFICE is likely to decide that MILITARY ACTION is what would be necessary.
As a result, C seems to imply that MILITARY ACTION would be MILITARILY necessary -- an error of redundancy.
Eliminate C.

in order to must serve to modify a VERB.
E: military action in order to
Here, in order to cannot serve to modify action (noun).
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.

B: if military action would be necessary
if + SUBJECT + would is always wrong.
Eliminate B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1