BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

SC - Being

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pmFollowed by: 70 members
Thanked: 165 times
by karthikpandian19 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:13 pm
Being a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma that occurs in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance, for instance, the Hahn-Banach theorem asserting that every vector space has a basis and Tychonoff's theorem stating that every product of compact spaces is compact.


(A) Being a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma that occurs in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance

(B) Being a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma, which occurring in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance

(C) A proposition of set theory is occurring in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance, Zorn's lemma

(D) A proposition of set theory, Zorn's lemma occurs in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance

(E) Occurring in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance, a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pmFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 99 times

by vk_vinayak » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:05 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:Being a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma that occurs in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance, for instance, the Hahn-Banach theorem asserting that every vector space has a basis and Tychonoff's theorem stating that every product of compact spaces is compact.


(A) Being a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma that occurs in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance >> Being is not necessary

(B) Being a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma, which occurring in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance >> Being is not necessary. 'Occurring' is not correct.

(C) A proposition of set theory is occurring in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance, Zorn's lemma >> Awkward construction

(D) A proposition of set theory, Zorn's lemma occurs in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance

(E) Occurring in the proofs of several theorems of crucial importance, a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma >> 'Occurring' should modify Zorn's lemma and not proposition. Construction is also awkward.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pmFollowed by: 70 members
Thanked: 165 times

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:06 pm
OA is D

OE is

Beginning the noun clause with being is extremely awkward and makes the meaning of the sentence unclear and difficult to read.

Choice D removes the awkward being and turns a proposition of set theory into a correctly placed modifier describing Zorn's lemma. Choice D is correct.

Choice B retains the awkward being and changes the verb occurs into the verbal occurring, which cannot act as the main verb of the adjective clause; the sentence thus becomes a fragment.

Choice C incorrectly uses an independent clause as an opening modifier and fails to provide a main verb to describe Zorn's lemma, making the sentence illogical.

Choice E contains a misplaced modifier, since the opening phrase is meant to describe Zorn's lemma and not just a general proposition of set theory. The sentence is also illogical because the examples introduced by for instance are meant to describe the theorems that Zorn's lemma occurs in, not the fact that a proposition of set theory is Zorn's lemma.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1