BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Relative Costs

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

Relative Costs

by imskpwr » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:01 am
With adjustments for inflation, the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973.

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 7:08 am
Thanked: 322 times
Followed by:143 members

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:29 am
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sc-doubt-t115359.html#484565
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:The key issue in this question is PARALLELISM.
Answer a is incorrect since the two phrases compared are different parts of speech. Also it sounds as if "the welfare program" resulted from the drop in costs. The correct structure should be "the welfare program's now costing"
Answer b - incorrect. The wording is exactly the same but "than" was replaced with "as." However, the structure is still wrong.
Answer c also contains the same mistake although the part of the sentence following THAN was corrected.
"resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did [cost]"
Answer d is correct.
Answer e is incorrect since it compares a clause with a prepositional phrase.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by imskpwr » Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:14 am
although i choose C within 20 secs in the exam(timing problem), i still don't understand the problem with the first part structure that you have mentioned.

hope if you can elaborate that portion only.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:19 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by mv12 » Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:52 am
D it is.
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by imskpwr » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:37 pm
imskpwr wrote:although i choose C within 20 secs in the exam(timing problem), i still don't understand the problem with the first part structure that you have mentioned.

hope if you can elaborate that portion only.
Waiting for some expert to reply on this.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:02 pm
imskpwr wrote:
imskpwr wrote:although i choose C within 20 secs in the exam(timing problem), i still don't understand the problem with the first part structure that you have mentioned.

hope if you can elaborate that portion only.
Waiting for some expert to reply on this.
A,B and C can be directly eliminated based on "resulting in welfare programme".

When we write - "resulting in X" then it signifies that X is the outcome. Here welfare programme cannot be the outcome. Eliminate A,B and C.


Hope this helps !!
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:59 am
imskpwr wrote:With adjustments for inflation, the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973.

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

In A, B and C, resulting in the welfare program is incorrect. The welfare program was not the result. The result was its costing about 3 billion real dollars less. The correct construction would be resulting in the welfare program's costing about 3 billion real dollars less. (Please note that this construction would be grammatically sound but awkward and unlikely to be in the correct answer choice.) Eliminate A, B and C.

E incorrectly compares 3 billion dollars less to implement to in 1973. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:40 am
Followed by:1 members

by Newbie_FastLearner » Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:51 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
imskpwr wrote:With adjustments for inflation, the relative cost of welfare benefits has been dropping since 1973, resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than in 1973.

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement as

resulting in the welfare program now costing about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and as a result the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less to implement than it did

and the welfare program now costs about 3 billion real dollars less as a result to implement than

In A, B and C, resulting in the welfare program is incorrect. The welfare program was not the result. The result was its costing about 3 billion real dollars less. The correct construction would be resulting in the welfare program's costing about 3 billion real dollars less. (Please note that this construction would be grammatically sound but awkward and unlikely to be in the correct answer choice.) Eliminate A, B and C.

E incorrectly compares 3 billion dollars less to implement to in 1973. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.


Hi,
Comma+Verb+ing refers to the subject of the preceding clause. Here in Options A,B,C "resulting" refers to the subject of previous sentence ie,the relative cost. Since the relative cost in itself cant result into the welfare program, so the options A,B,C are incorrect. I used this strategy to eliminate the choice. Plz let me know if im correct.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1