In the last press conference, the production manager declared that the factory had not only more efficient assembly lines than before, it also had faster packaging machines, that have reduced the cost of manufacturing by 16%.
a) more efficient assembly lines than before, it also had faster packaging machines, that have reduced the
b) more efficient assembly lines than before, but also had faster packaging machines, reducing the
c) assembly lines more efficient than before, but had faster packaging machines also, resulting in a reduction of the
d)more efficient assembly lines than before, but also faster packaging machines, resulting in a reduced
e) assembly lines more efficient than before, but faster packaging machines also, resulting in a reduction in the
I eliminated A,B , C as they have incorrect idiom usage - had not only but also had
Between D & E, again the option D has had not only X but Y also
I chose D and found it is incorrect due to ambiguity in meaning - more efficient lines than before or more number of assembly lines than before
I agree with the ambiguity in meaning now but how about the idiom usage in E ?
Please explain
SC - Modifier
This topic has expert replies
- prachi18oct
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 10:33 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 11:56 pm
- Thanked: 4 times
1. Not only.........but also is a conditional clause and only option B & D have them.
2. Option D is wrong because it does not follow the rules of parallelism.
packaging, resulting , reduced , manufacturing. It should be reducing.
So I think option B is right.
2. Option D is wrong because it does not follow the rules of parallelism.
packaging, resulting , reduced , manufacturing. It should be reducing.
So I think option B is right.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
A, B and D: more efficient assembly lines than beforersarashi wrote:I also come down to option D.
@Experts , Please explain why D is wrong.
Thanks
Here, the intended meaning is unclear.
Interpretation 1: The number of efficient assembly lines has increased.
Whereas before there were FEWER assembly lines that were efficient, now there are MORE assembly lines that are efficient.
Interpretation 2: The assembly lines have become more efficient
Whereas before the assembly lines were LESS efficient, now they are MORE efficient.
Since the intended meaning is unclear, eliminate A, B and D.
Idiom: not only X but also Y
In this idiom, X and Y must be PARALLEL FORMS.
C: not only ASSEMBLY LINES...but also HAD
Here, assembly lines (noun) and had (verb) are not parallel forms.
Eliminate C.
The correct answer is E.
OA: The factory had not only assembly lines more efficient than before, but faster packaging machines also.
Here, some test-takers might question the placement of also.
I cannot cite an official SC with this sort of placement.
That said, the position of also seems insufficient reason to eliminate E.
For a deeper discussion of not only X but also Y -- along with variations of this idiom -- check here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/not-only-x-b ... 88545.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- solitaryreaper
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 3:02 am
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Source: GMAT Club testsolitaryreaper wrote:Hi Prachi/others
What is the source of this question. Is it from some official source?
Thanks
https://gmatclub.com/forum/v11-210904.html
- solitaryreaper
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 3:02 am
- Followed by:1 members
Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:A, B and D: more efficient assembly lines than beforersarashi wrote:I also come down to option D.
@Experts , Please explain why D is wrong.
Thanks
Here, the intended meaning is unclear.
Interpretation 1: The number of efficient assembly lines has increased.
Whereas before there were FEWER assembly lines that were efficient, now there are MORE assembly lines that are efficient.
Interpretation 2: The assembly lines have become more efficient
Whereas before the assembly lines were LESS efficient, now they are MORE efficient.
Since the intended meaning is unclear, eliminate A, B and D.
Idiom: not only X but also Y
In this idiom, X and Y must be PARALLEL FORMS.
C: not only ASSEMBLY LINES...but also HAD
Here, assembly lines (noun) and had (verb) are not parallel forms.
Eliminate C.
The correct answer is E.
OA: The factory had not only assembly lines more efficient than before, but faster packaging machines also.
Here, some test-takers might question the placement of also.
I cannot cite an official SC with this sort of placement.
That said, the position of also seems insufficient reason to eliminate E.
For a deeper discussion of not only X but also Y -- along with variations of this idiom -- check here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/not-only-x-b ... 88545.html
Based on the semantic distinction between not only X but also Y and not only X but Y that you've explained in the above mentioned url, the OA (option E)for the original problem should fall in which category (not only X but also or not only X but Y)?
Best regards
SR[/b]
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In the OA, the usage not only X but Y also is the equivalent of not only X but also Y.solitaryreaper wrote:Hi Mitch,gmatguruny wrote:OA: The factory had not only assembly lines more efficient than before, but faster packaging machines also.
For a deeper discussion of not only X but also Y -- along with variations of this idiom -- check here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/not-only-x-b ... 88545.html
Based on the semantic distinction between not only X but also Y and not only X but Y that you've explained in the above mentioned url, the OA (option E)for the original problem should fall in which category (not only X but also or not only X but Y)?
The semantic implication in each case is that X and Y are similar but independent events.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 5:55 am
Here, 'more efficient assembly lines' is not the correct usage as per the meaning.
The meaning is that the assembly lines have become more efficient now and not the increase in number of efficient assembly lines.
So by this logic A, B and D can be eliminated.
Another point to note is usage of idiom 'not only X but also Y'
in C and E, usage of 'had' after but is redundant. E is the right answer.
Note that the 'also' of 'but also' has changed its place. As long as the meaning and grammar is correct, it is acceptable.
The meaning is that the assembly lines have become more efficient now and not the increase in number of efficient assembly lines.
So by this logic A, B and D can be eliminated.
Another point to note is usage of idiom 'not only X but also Y'
in C and E, usage of 'had' after but is redundant. E is the right answer.
Note that the 'also' of 'but also' has changed its place. As long as the meaning and grammar is correct, it is acceptable.