22. The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum
scam, which resulted in a loss of about $1.7 trillion to the exchequer.
A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which
resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting
( I understand the question is relating to tenses - i can eliminate answer D as it sounds incorrect, but between the other options how do you decide between had been and has been, because the statement could indicate either of them. I thought had been made more sense because of those 2 past tense verbs Indicted and Resulted in there - so i assumed that 2 things happened in the past -hence option A - but that is not the correct answer.
An explanation to the correct answer would be highly appreciated !
scam, which resulted in a loss of about $1.7 trillion to the exchequer.
A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which
resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting
( I understand the question is relating to tenses - i can eliminate answer D as it sounds incorrect, but between the other options how do you decide between had been and has been, because the statement could indicate either of them. I thought had been made more sense because of those 2 past tense verbs Indicted and Resulted in there - so i assumed that 2 things happened in the past -hence option A - but that is not the correct answer.
An explanation to the correct answer would be highly appreciated !
