BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

mgmat sc: 700-800

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:32 am
Thanked: 17 times
by this_time_i_will » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:33 pm
During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to free market principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers.

principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of various government regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers

principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations that variously restrict worker hiring and firing

principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various government regulations, its functioning being stifled

principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:48 am
Thanked: 1 times

by varundaga05 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:45 pm
Is it B ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:46 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Thanked: 37 times
GMAT Score:700

by sk818020 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:47 pm
IMO E.

I chose E because I believe the second clause is a complete sentence on its own and should be set apart with a semicolon and "its" in the second part of D is ambiguous. Thus E, was left.

Could you please confirm the OA?

I hope this helps.

Thanks,

Jared
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:57 pm
I will also go with E.

As the subject in the first clause is labor market, "its" in the second clause will refer to labor market. "Has been" seems suitable as it is still going on.

Thanks,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 10:04 am
Thanked: 5 times

by apex231 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:12 pm
I prefer B over E.

In E, using "Instead" after a semicolon doesn't show continuity in argument/thought. Using comma, as in B is much better.
Also,option B is more parallel, "instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner" is parallel to "labor market in France has not been operating" in the preceding clause.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times

by sumanr84 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:15 pm
Viju is Right on.

Putting a take-away from Stacey's post :

When there are two independent clauses (as in choice E) and the second one contains a pronoun as part of the subject, the structural expectation is that the pronoun refers to the subject of the first clause.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc- ... t5227.html
I am on a break !!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 10:04 am
Thanked: 5 times

by apex231 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:57 pm
What's wrong with option B? Is it wrong because it contains "as a result of" which I think is wrong or is there any other reason also to eliminate B?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times

by sumanr84 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:05 pm
apex231 wrote:What's wrong with option B? Is it wrong because it contains "as a result of" which I think is wrong or is there any other reason also to eliminate B?
B is a run-on sentence. Pasting explanation from MGMAT thread(refer thread in my prev post),

(B) has a grammatical problem. This sentence comprises two clauses.

During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to free market principles

AND

instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of various government regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers.


These two clauses will have to be grammatically connected by a conjunction such as and, but, yet, etc. (Remember "instead" is an adverb so cannot act as a conjunction.) In (B), since the two clauses are not connected by a conjunction, the sentence becomes a "run-on" sentence. Thus (B) cannot be correct. (E) corrects this error by using the ";", signifying the equality of the clauses. The conjunction isn't required here.

Thus (E) is grammatically correct.
I am on a break !!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:35 pm
Very nice explanation Sumanth :).

Thanks,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:32 am
Thanked: 17 times

by this_time_i_will » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:32 am
OA is E as explained by sumanr84
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:27 pm
In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:06 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by tnaim » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:55 pm
paes wrote:In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
While I followed my intuition and chose option E (....;instead,....), after reading your post I think you're bringing up a valid point: each of the phrases, before and after the semicolon, needs to be complete on its own; however, that was not the case in option E.
I too would appreciate an explanation on this.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:32 am
Thanked: 17 times

by this_time_i_will » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:09 pm
paes wrote:In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
As MGMAT SC says:
The semicolon may follow a conjunctive Adverb or other transition expression, such as however, therefore, or in addition.
Instead also falls in this category.
A similar example:
Ancient tribes used to fight a lot; therefore, they became history.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 10:04 am
Thanked: 5 times

by apex231 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:23 pm
tnaim wrote:
paes wrote:In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
While I followed my intuition and chose option E (....;instead,....), after reading your post I think you're bringing up a valid point: each of the phrases, before and after the semicolon, needs to be complete on its own; however, that was not the case in option E.
I too would appreciate an explanation on this.
Even I thought the same and chose B. But the sentence uses "instead" and not "instead of". As many have already explained, "Instead" is a conjunctive adverb and the correct punctuation for conjunctive adverbs is to place a semicolon/period before the conjunctive adverb and a comma after it. If the second clause contained "instead of" then it would have been wrong. So option E is correct.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:26 am
Thanks Apex
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked