BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

mgmat sc: 700-800

Expert replies
by this_time_i_will » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:33 pm
During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to free market principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers.

principles, but instead stifling functioning through its various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

principles, instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of various government regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers

principles, rather functioning despite being stifled as a result of government regulations that variously restrict worker hiring and firing

principles; the hiring and firing of workers is restricted there by various government regulations, its functioning being stifled

principles; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by varundaga05 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:45 pm
Is it B ?
Join the discussion

by sk818020 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:47 pm
IMO E.

I chose E because I believe the second clause is a complete sentence on its own and should be set apart with a semicolon and "its" in the second part of D is ambiguous. Thus E, was left.

Could you please confirm the OA?

I hope this helps.

Thanks,

Jared
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:57 pm
I will also go with E.

As the subject in the first clause is labor market, "its" in the second clause will refer to labor market. "Has been" seems suitable as it is still going on.

Thanks,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by apex231 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:12 pm
I prefer B over E.

In E, using "Instead" after a semicolon doesn't show continuity in argument/thought. Using comma, as in B is much better.
Also,option B is more parallel, "instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner" is parallel to "labor market in France has not been operating" in the preceding clause.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:15 pm
Viju is Right on.

Putting a take-away from Stacey's post :

When there are two independent clauses (as in choice E) and the second one contains a pronoun as part of the subject, the structural expectation is that the pronoun refers to the subject of the first clause.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc- ... t5227.html
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by apex231 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:57 pm
What's wrong with option B? Is it wrong because it contains "as a result of" which I think is wrong or is there any other reason also to eliminate B?
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:05 pm
apex231 wrote:What's wrong with option B? Is it wrong because it contains "as a result of" which I think is wrong or is there any other reason also to eliminate B?
B is a run-on sentence. Pasting explanation from MGMAT thread(refer thread in my prev post),

(B) has a grammatical problem. This sentence comprises two clauses.

During the past decade, the labor market in France has not been operating according to free market principles

AND

instead it has been functioning in a stifled manner as a result of various government regulations that restrict the hiring and firing of workers.


These two clauses will have to be grammatically connected by a conjunction such as and, but, yet, etc. (Remember "instead" is an adverb so cannot act as a conjunction.) In (B), since the two clauses are not connected by a conjunction, the sentence becomes a "run-on" sentence. Thus (B) cannot be correct. (E) corrects this error by using the ";", signifying the equality of the clauses. The conjunction isn't required here.

Thus (E) is grammatically correct
.
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:35 pm
Very nice explanation Sumanth :).

Thanks,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by this_time_i_will » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:32 am
OA is E as explained by sumanr84
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:27 pm
In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
Join the discussion

by tnaim » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:55 pm
paes wrote:In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
While I followed my intuition and chose option E (....;instead,....), after reading your post I think you're bringing up a valid point: each of the phrases, before and after the semicolon, needs to be complete on its own; however, that was not the case in option E.
I too would appreciate an explanation on this.
Join the discussion

by this_time_i_will » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:09 pm
paes wrote:In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
As MGMAT SC says:
The semicolon may follow a conjunctive Adverb or other transition expression, such as however, therefore, or in addition.
Instead also falls in this category.
A similar example:
Ancient tribes used to fight a lot; therefore, they became history.
Join the discussion

by apex231 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:23 pm
tnaim wrote:
paes wrote:In E :

; instead, its functioning has been stifled by various government regulations restricting the hiring and firing of workers

I am not clear how it is a independent clause.

because of word 'instead', this clause is not looking an independent clause.
While I followed my intuition and chose option E (....;instead,....), after reading your post I think you're bringing up a valid point: each of the phrases, before and after the semicolon, needs to be complete on its own; however, that was not the case in option E.
I too would appreciate an explanation on this.
Even I thought the same and chose B. But the sentence uses "instead" and not "instead of". As many have already explained, "Instead" is a conjunctive adverb and the correct punctuation for conjunctive adverbs is to place a semicolon/period before the conjunctive adverb and a comma after it. If the second clause contained "instead of" then it would have been wrong. So option E is correct.
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:26 am
Thanks Apex
Join the discussion