BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Support - LSAT - Need help

Expert replies
by voodoo_child » Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:52 pm
PT37.2.22 -
Political theorist: Many people believe that the punishment of those who commit even the most heinous crimes should be mitigated to some extent if the crime was motivated by a sincere desire to achieve some larger good. Granted, some criminals with admirable motives deserve mitigated punishments. Nonetheless, judges should never mitigate punishment on the basis of motives, since motives are essentially a matter of conjecture and even vicious motives can easily be presented as altruistic.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the political theorist's reasoning?
A. Law that prohibit or permit actions solely on the basis of psychological states should not be part of the legal system.
B. It is better to err on the side of overly sever punishment than to err on the side of overly lenient punishment.
C. The legal permissibility of actions should depend on the perceivable consequences of those actions.
D. No law that cannot be enforced should be enacted.
E. A legal system that, if adopted, would have disastrous consequences ought not be adopted.

OA - B.

Why is A incorrect? Thoughts?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:29 pm
The problem with A is that the conclusion is specifically about the level of punishment issued and whether that level should be mitigated by motive. This is a separate issue from the laws themselves.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by voodoo_child » Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:45 pm
Bill,
Thanks for reply. I have a follow-up question :

Conclusion - Judges should never mitigate punishment based on motives.

Premise - Motives are essentially a matter of conjecture and motives can be changed.

Assumption - Judges can know motives of criminals.
Assumption - Judges can influence the severity of punishment.

I see how B) is correct. But can we say that "Motives" are not "psychological state" in A?
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:43 pm
On the LSAT, we would probably be expected to make that connection, but the GMAT is typically a bit more direct in its language...I think we could rule out A for that reason.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by mmgmat » Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:07 pm
Please use spoiler for the OA.
Thanks for the question.
Join the discussion

by mv12 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:47 pm
Vodoo-child..pls try to learn how to use spoilers in your post.
voodoo_child wrote:PT37.2.22 -
Political theorist: Many people believe that the punishment of those who commit even the most heinous crimes should be mitigated to some extent if the crime was motivated by a sincere desire to achieve some larger good. Granted, some criminals with admirable motives deserve mitigated punishments. Nonetheless, judges should never mitigate punishment on the basis of motives, since motives are essentially a matter of conjecture and even vicious motives can easily be presented as altruistic.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the political theorist's reasoning?
A. Law that prohibit or permit actions solely on the basis of psychological states should not be part of the legal system.
B. It is better to err on the side of overly sever punishment than to err on the side of overly lenient punishment.
C. The legal permissibility of actions should depend on the perceivable consequences of those actions.
D. No law that cannot be enforced should be enacted.
E. A legal system that, if adopted, would have disastrous consequences ought not be adopted.

OA - B.

Why is A incorrect? Thoughts?
Join the discussion