BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sales tax & fed tax

Expert replies
by desdinova » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:22 am
hi, can anyone help find the ans with explanation

One state adds a 7 percent sales tax to the price of most products purchased within its jurisdiction. This tax, therefore, if viewed as tax on income, has the reverse effect of the federal income tax: the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if which of the following were assumed as a premise?
(A) The amount of money citizens spend on products subject to the state tax tends to be equal across income levels.
(B) The federal income tax favors citizens with high incomes, whereas the state sales tax favors citizens with low incomes.
(C) Citizens with low annual incomes can afford to pay a relatively higher percentage of their incomes in state sales tax, since their federal income tax is relatively low.
(D) The lower a state's sales tax, the more it will tend to redistribute income from the more affluent citizens to the rest of society.
(E) Citizens who fail to earn federally taxable income are also exempt from the state sales tax.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed Jun 27, 2012 1:03 pm
Conclusion: the 7 percent sales tax has the opposite effect of the income tax.

Income tax percentages increase as income increases. If sales tax has the opposite effect, then its effective rate decreases as income increases.

Which answer is required for that to make sense?

A--Correct. Since the sales tax is a flat rate, the amount spent on taxable goods determines its effective rate. If citizens spend the same amount on taxable goods, then the effective rate decreases as income increases. For example:

Each citizen spends $1000 on taxable goods. At 7 percent, each citizen pays $70 in sales tax. If person A makes $2,000, then that $70 is 3.5 percent of their income. If person B makes $4,000, then that $70 is 1.75 percent of their income.

B--Irrelevant. We aren't looking at favoritism in tax rates.

C--Irrelevant. The argument is simply about the effect of sales tax.

D--Irrelevant. There is nothing about income redistribution.

E--This may contradict the argument.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by hey_thr67 » Wed Jun 27, 2012 5:44 pm
IMO is A.


The technique is to isolate the conclusion first and then directly see if the assumption is necessary for the conclusion or not. Here the conclusion is,

the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.

Now let's look at the ans choices.

(A) The amount of money citizens spend on products subject to the state tax tends to be equal across income levels.

If this condition doesn't hold then we can not say what effect it has on citizens with different salaries. It might be the case that citizen with higher salaries have higher sales tax. In that condition conclusion doesn't hold true. Hence this answer choice is CORRECT.

(B) The federal income tax favors citizens with high incomes, whereas the state sales tax favors citizens with low incomes. WRONG.

This statement is not necessary for the conclusion to be drawn. This is an example of scope shift. The conclusion is not about what favours what ?

(C) Citizens with low annual incomes can afford to pay a relatively higher percentage of their incomes in state sales tax, since their federal income tax is relatively low.

Again a scope shift. The argument is not about affordability. WRONG.

(D) The lower a state's sales tax, the more it will tend to redistribute income from the more affluent citizens to the rest of society.

Generalization is not what is intended here. WRONG.

(E) Citizens who fail to earn federally taxable income are also exempt from the state sales tax.

Out of scope. WRONG.


This question seems relatively easy. as other choices seem to be out of scope. [/i]
Join the discussion

by sandeep_thaparianz » Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:01 pm
+1 for A
Join the discussion