BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT prep <Siberia's lake>

Expert replies
by vaishalijain7 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 5:48 am
Anyone please explain what should be the answer and why? Also please explain why other options are wrong.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: GMAT prep <Siberia's lake>

by hemanth28 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:59 am
vaishalijain7 wrote:Anyone please explain what should be the answer and why? Also please explain why other options are wrong.
IMO A. Let me give my shot.

B "that is more than.." is a modifier which cant be removed. However in this case it is used as optional modifier.

C - it holds . awkward framing of sentance.

D- While is used describe a instance of time. Eg :- while i am walking

E :- what is it that "More than all the north indian lakes combined" modifying ? is it lake baikal ?

what is OA?
GMAT First take :- 680
Getting the guns ready for second shot !!!
https://beatenbygmat.blocked
Join the discussion

by hetavdave » Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:08 am
IMO - A.
Totally agree with hemanth28's explanation.
Join the discussion

by ghacker » Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:56 am
This is a question about modifiers

Modifiers must be placed closed to the things they modify

More than all ...................... and More than 20 percent ........... must be placed as close as possible

More than all .............. adds / gives or explains the 20% of the worlds .......

Which hold 20% gives information about the lake

SO the best choice is A
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 12:51 pm
One small query....Although "A" looks best...

but to complete the comparsion....don't we need...

more than "that of" all lakes combined...

Can someone please tell why omission of "that of" correct here.
Join the discussion

by hemanth28 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:45 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:One small query....Although "A" looks best...

but to complete the comparsion....don't we need...

more than "that of" all lakes combined...

Can someone please tell why omission of "that of" correct here.
Even I think 'that of' should have been present. However I came to conclusion based on elimination. So even I have the same doubt. Need some experts to comment on it .
GMAT First take :- 680
Getting the guns ready for second shot !!!
https://beatenbygmat.blocked
Join the discussion

by BrianSmith » Sun Jun 28, 2009 4:59 am
More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.
I think it's A too, but I don't understand why you think it's missing 'that of'. What do you think about the following view of the sentence:

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal
[ is the main clause ]

, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water
[is a relative clause describing "Siberia's Lake Baikal"]

(which is) more than all the North American Great Lakes (hold) combined.
[is another clause, describing "20 percent of the world's fresh water"]
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:40 am
BrianSmith wrote:
More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.
I think it's A too, but I don't understand why you think it's missing 'that of'. What do you think about the following view of the sentence:

More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal
[ is the main clause ]

, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water
[is a relative clause describing "Siberia's Lake Baikal"]

(which is) more than all the North American Great Lakes (hold) combined.
[is another clause, describing "20 percent of the world's fresh water"]
Hi Brian,

The doubt comes because you are assuming "hold" to be there....in the last sentence...

If we do not assume "hold" to be there then comparison becomes like

"Amount more than.....lakes....".

I suppose this is the case of eliptical clause....that confuses me and many others a lot...

Can you please tell when we can assume these type of implicit info to be there and when not....

There are some examples in OG-10 and 11, where it clearly says that "that of/those of" is needed to complete the comparison.

Thanks
Mohit
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:01 am
A it is..
Join the discussion