BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

sailboat hulls

Expert replies
by sridevipavan » Sun May 01, 2011 12:39 am
At an enormous research cost, a leading chemical company has developed a manufacturing process for converting wood fibers into a plastic. According to the company, this new plastic can be used for, among other things, the hulls of small sailboats. But what does the company think sailboat hulls used to be made of? Surely the mania for high technology can scarcely go further than this.


18. The author's opinion of the manufacturing process described in the passage is based primarily on the fact that
(A) plastic is unlikely to be durable enough for high-quality sailboat hulls
(B) the research costs of developing the process outweigh any savings possible from the use of the plastic
(C) a small sailboat is not normally regarded as a high-tech product
(D) hulls for small sailboats can be made from wood without converting it into plastic
(E) many other spheres of human activity are in far greater need of technological research

19. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the author's conclusion?
(A) The plastic produced by the process is considerably lighter, stronger, and more watertight than wood.
(B) The wood used in producing the plastic is itself in increasingly short supply.
(C) The cost of the manufacturing process of the plastic increases the cost of producing a sailboat hull by 10 to 15 percent.
(D) Much of the cost of the research that developed the new process will be written off for tax purposes by the chemical company.
(E) The development of the new plastic is expected to help make the chemical company an important supplier of boat-building materials.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Sun May 01, 2011 10:18 pm
sridevipavan wrote:At an enormous research cost, a leading chemical company has developed a manufacturing process for converting wood fibers into a plastic. According to the company, this new plastic can be used for, among other things, the hulls of small sailboats. But what does the company think sailboat hulls used to be made of? Surely the mania for high technology can scarcely go further than this.


18. The author's opinion of the manufacturing process described in the passage is based primarily on the fact that
(A) plastic is unlikely to be durable enough for high-quality sailboat hulls
(B) the research costs of developing the process outweigh any savings possible from the use of the plastic
(C) a small sailboat is not normally regarded as a high-tech product
(D) hulls for small sailboats can be made from wood without converting it into plastic
(E) many other spheres of human activity are in far greater need of technological research

19. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the author's conclusion?
(A) The plastic produced by the process is considerably lighter, stronger, and more watertight than wood.
(B) The wood used in producing the plastic is itself in increasingly short supply.
(C) The cost of the manufacturing process of the plastic increases the cost of producing a sailboat hull by 10 to 15 percent.
(D) Much of the cost of the research that developed the new process will be written off for tax purposes by the chemical company.
(E) The development of the new plastic is expected to help make the chemical company an important supplier of boat-building materials.
I doubt that this is a real GMAT question, as it relies on a "soft", "where is the author coming from?" type argument, rather than a harder premises -> assumption -> conclusion logical one. Could you specify your difficulties here? Which answer choices did you think were the right ones, and why?
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Mon May 02, 2011 4:27 am
@Geva: A previous expert has given the answer to weaken question .

https://www.beatthegmat.com/hull-boats-t22781.html

But for the assumption question, I do not think any of the ACs correct ones. your comment please.
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Mon May 02, 2011 4:45 am
Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:
sridevipavan wrote:At an enormous research cost, a leading chemical company has developed a manufacturing process for converting wood fibers into a plastic. According to the company, this new plastic can be used for, among other things, the hulls of small sailboats. But what does the company think sailboat hulls used to be made of? Surely the mania for high technology can scarcely go further than this.


18. The author's opinion of the manufacturing process described in the passage is based primarily on the fact that
(A) plastic is unlikely to be durable enough for high-quality sailboat hulls
(B) the research costs of developing the process outweigh any savings possible from the use of the plastic
(C) a small sailboat is not normally regarded as a high-tech product
(D) hulls for small sailboats can be made from wood without converting it into plastic
(E) many other spheres of human activity are in far greater need of technological research

19. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the author's conclusion?
(A) The plastic produced by the process is considerably lighter, stronger, and more watertight than wood.
(B) The wood used in producing the plastic is itself in increasingly short supply.
(C) The cost of the manufacturing process of the plastic increases the cost of producing a sailboat hull by 10 to 15 percent.
(D) Much of the cost of the research that developed the new process will be written off for tax purposes by the chemical company.
(E) The development of the new plastic is expected to help make the chemical company an important supplier of boat-building materials.
I doubt that this is a real GMAT question, as it relies on a "soft", "where is the author coming from?" type argument, rather than a harder premises -> assumption -> conclusion logical one. Could you specify your difficulties here? Which answer choices did you think were the right ones, and why?
As I said, this problem is unusual in that it uses rhetoric, rather than logic. The key to the problem, and the question you should be asking yourself is - What does the author mean when he says "But what does the company think sailboat hulls used to be made of? Surely the mania for high technology can scarcely go further than this."

With the sentence above, the author is pointing out the folly of going to all the effort to turn perfectly good wood into plastic, then into a boat - when you can just skip the technology "middle man" and just a build a boat from wood. But the author does not physically state this last fact, making this the unstated assumption behind his argument.

I believe the answer is D: if the hulls of small boats CANNOT be made from wood without converting it into plastic, then there is concrete justification for the technology to turn the wood into plastic other than the "mania for technology" cited by the author. Thus, in order to reach the conclusion that the case presented exemplifies technology developed just because of the Mania for technology (and not for other, more pragmatic causes), the author must assume that there is no other reason to develop the technology - in other words, that small boats CAN be made from wood without turning the wood into plastic first.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by sridevipavan » Mon May 02, 2011 7:05 am
18. D

19. C

I am not sure of the answers. But according to me, the author is trying to say that "sailboat hulls can be made of wood without converting the wood to plastic". Please let me know if I am correct.
Join the discussion

by sridevipavan » Mon May 02, 2011 7:07 am
18. D

19. C

I am not sure of the answers. But according to me, the author is trying to say that "sailboat hulls can be made of wood without converting the wood to plastic". Please let me know if I am correct.
Join the discussion

by sridevipavan » Mon May 02, 2011 7:08 am
18. D

19. C

I am not sure of the answers. But according to me, the author is trying to say that "sailboat hulls can be made of wood without converting the wood to plastic". Please let me know if I am correct.
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Mon May 02, 2011 7:25 am
sridevipavan wrote:18. D

19. C

I am not sure of the answers. But according to me, the author is trying to say that "sailboat hulls can be made of wood without converting the wood to plastic". Please let me know if I am correct.
You are right about what the author is trying to say. It is precisely because of this analysis that the answer to Q19 is A (and not C): Answer choice A provides a reason why the boat NEEDS to be made of plastic (and not wood), and thus weakens the author's conclusion that the move from wood to plastic is a needless exercise.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion